From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/radeon: add timeout argument to radeon_fence_wait_seq
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F211C5.3050406@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F2118F.8000706@canonical.com>
This makes it possible to wait for a specific amount of time,
rather than wait until infinity.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index 94eca53d99f8..e8ea423648ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -320,22 +320,25 @@ static bool radeon_fence_any_seq_signaled(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 *seq)
}
/**
- * radeon_fence_wait_seq - wait for a specific sequence numbers
+ * radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout - wait for a specific sequence numbers
*
* @rdev: radeon device pointer
* @target_seq: sequence number(s) we want to wait for
* @intr: use interruptable sleep
+ * @timeout: maximum time to wait, or MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT for infinite wait
*
* Wait for the requested sequence number(s) to be written by any ring
* (all asics). Sequnce number array is indexed by ring id.
* @intr selects whether to use interruptable (true) or non-interruptable
* (false) sleep when waiting for the sequence number. Helper function
* for radeon_fence_wait_*().
- * Returns 0 if the sequence number has passed, error for all other cases.
+ * Returns remaining time if the sequence number has passed, 0 when
+ * the wait timeout, or an error for all other cases.
* -EDEADLK is returned when a GPU lockup has been detected.
*/
-static int radeon_fence_wait_seq(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 *target_seq,
- bool intr)
+static long radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(struct radeon_device *rdev,
+ u64 *target_seq, bool intr,
+ long timeout)
{
uint64_t last_seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS];
bool signaled;
@@ -357,11 +360,11 @@ static int radeon_fence_wait_seq(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 *target_seq,
if (intr) {
r = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rdev->fence_queue, (
(signaled = radeon_fence_any_seq_signaled(rdev, target_seq))
- || rdev->needs_reset), MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ || rdev->needs_reset), timeout);
} else {
r = wait_event_timeout(rdev->fence_queue, (
(signaled = radeon_fence_any_seq_signaled(rdev, target_seq))
- || rdev->needs_reset), MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ || rdev->needs_reset), timeout);
}
for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
@@ -372,20 +375,22 @@ static int radeon_fence_wait_seq(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 *target_seq,
trace_radeon_fence_wait_end(rdev->ddev, i, target_seq[i]);
}
- if (r < 0)
+ if (r <= 0)
return r;
if (rdev->needs_reset)
return -EDEADLK;
+
+ timeout = r;
}
- return 0;
+ return timeout;
}
/**
* radeon_fence_wait - wait for a fence to signal
*
* @fence: radeon fence object
- * @intr: use interruptable sleep
+ * @intr: use interruptible sleep
*
* Wait for the requested fence to signal (all asics).
* @intr selects whether to use interruptable (true) or non-interruptable
@@ -395,7 +400,7 @@ static int radeon_fence_wait_seq(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 *target_seq,
int radeon_fence_wait(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool intr)
{
uint64_t seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {};
- int r;
+ long r;
if (fence == NULL) {
WARN(1, "Querying an invalid fence : %p !\n", fence);
@@ -406,9 +411,10 @@ int radeon_fence_wait(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool intr)
if (seq[fence->ring] == RADEON_FENCE_SIGNALED_SEQ)
return 0;
- r = radeon_fence_wait_seq(fence->rdev, seq, intr);
- if (r)
+ r = radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(fence->rdev, seq, intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ if (r < 0) {
return r;
+ }
fence->seq = RADEON_FENCE_SIGNALED_SEQ;
return 0;
@@ -433,7 +439,7 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev,
{
uint64_t seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS];
unsigned i, num_rings = 0;
- int r;
+ long r;
for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
seq[i] = 0;
@@ -454,8 +460,8 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev,
if (num_rings == 0)
return -ENOENT;
- r = radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, intr);
- if (r) {
+ r = radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(rdev, seq, intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ if (r < 0) {
return r;
}
return 0;
@@ -474,6 +480,7 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev,
int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
{
uint64_t seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {};
+ long r;
seq[ring] = atomic64_read(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq) + 1ULL;
if (seq[ring] >= rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring]) {
@@ -481,7 +488,10 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
already the last emited fence */
return -ENOENT;
}
- return radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, false);
+ r = radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(rdev, seq, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -497,18 +507,18 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
int radeon_fence_wait_empty(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
{
uint64_t seq[RADEON_NUM_RINGS] = {};
- int r;
+ long r;
seq[ring] = rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring];
if (!seq[ring])
return 0;
- r = radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, false);
- if (r) {
+ r = radeon_fence_wait_seq_timeout(rdev, seq, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ if (r < 0) {
if (r == -EDEADLK)
return -EDEADLK;
- dev_err(rdev->dev, "error waiting for ring[%d] to become idle (%d)\n",
+ dev_err(rdev->dev, "error waiting for ring[%d] to become idle (%ld)\n",
ring, r);
}
return 0;
--
2.0.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 14:45 [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: take exclusive_lock in read mode during ring tests Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-18 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/radeon: handle lockup in delayed work, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-18 15:12 ` Christian König
2014-08-18 15:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-18 16:20 ` Christian König
2014-08-18 14:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2014-08-18 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: take exclusive_lock in read mode during ring tests Christian König
2014-08-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: take exclusive_lock in read mode during ring tests, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-18 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/radeon: take exclusive_lock in read mode during ring tests Alex Deucher
2014-08-18 16:07 ` Christian König
2014-08-18 16:10 ` Alex Deucher
2014-08-18 20:02 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-18 20:56 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F211C5.3050406@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox