From: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
To: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS BO creation flag
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FEEEF4.7030401@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409208961-7322-1-git-send-email-michel@daenzer.net>
Am 28.08.2014 um 08:56 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
>
> This flag is a hint that userspace expects the BO to be accessed by the
> CPU. We can use that hint to prevent such BOs from ever being stored in
> the CPU inaccessible part of VRAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
This patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
I think we need a similar negative flags as well, e.g.
RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS.
This way we can stop forcing buffers into the visible VRAM while pinning
them for scanout.
Regards,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 11 +++++++++--
> include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> index dc74cc5..908ea541 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,12 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain)
>
> for (i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
> rbo->placements[i].fpfn = 0;
> - rbo->placements[i].lpfn = 0;
> + if ((rbo->flags & RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS) &&
> + (rbo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM))
> + rbo->placements[i].lpfn =
> + rbo->rdev->mc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + else
> + rbo->placements[i].lpfn = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -151,7 +156,9 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain)
> * improve fragmentation quality.
> * 512kb was measured as the most optimal number.
> */
> - if (rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) {
> + if (!((rbo->flags & RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS) &&
> + (rbo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM)) &&
> + rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) {
> for (i = 0; i < c; i++) {
> rbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN;
> }
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
> index 509b2d7..bf0067b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/radeon_drm.h
> @@ -799,6 +799,8 @@ struct drm_radeon_gem_info {
> #define RADEON_GEM_NO_BACKING_STORE (1 << 0)
> #define RADEON_GEM_GTT_UC (1 << 1)
> #define RADEON_GEM_GTT_WC (1 << 2)
> +/* BO is expected to be accessed by the CPU */
> +#define RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 3)
>
> struct drm_radeon_gem_create {
> uint64_t size;
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 6:56 [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS BO creation flag Michel Dänzer
2014-08-28 6:56 ` [PATCH] r600g, radeonsi: Inform the kernel if a BO will likely be accessed by the CPU Michel Dänzer
2014-09-01 10:21 ` [Mesa-dev] " Marek Olšák
2014-08-28 8:57 ` Christian König [this message]
2014-08-28 15:01 ` [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS BO creation flag Alex Deucher
2014-08-29 1:46 ` [Mesa-dev] " Michel Dänzer
2014-09-08 17:36 ` Alex Deucher
2014-09-09 0:47 ` [Mesa-dev] " Michel Dänzer
2014-09-09 1:15 ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-09 16:28 ` Alex Deucher
2014-09-10 4:03 ` Michel Dänzer
2014-09-10 13:40 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FEEEF4.7030401@vodafone.de \
--to=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox