From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/exynos: avoid race condition when adding a drm component
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:07:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546ED6A5.90207@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416527664-10553-2-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org>
On 2014년 11월 21일 08:54, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
>
> exynos_drm_component_add() correctly checks if a component is present on
> drm_component_list however it release the lock right after the check
> and before we add the new component to the list. That just creates room
> to add the same component more than once to the list.
A little bit strange. drm_component_list is protected from race
condition with mutex_lock. How the same component can be added to the
drm_component_list again? And a new cdev object cannot be same cdev
object already added to the drm_component_list because the new cdev
object is allocated by kzalloc(). And the only case the same kms driver
can request to add a new cdev to drm_component_list again is when the
probe of the driver failed. However, in this case, the driver will call
exynos_drm_component_del function to remove previous cdev. So the same
cdev cannot be added to the drm_component_list even in such case.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> The lock should be held for the whole journey while adding a new
> component.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> index cb3ed9b..230573d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
> @@ -402,10 +402,8 @@ int exynos_drm_component_add(struct device *dev,
> * added already just return.
> */
> if (cdev->dev_type_flag == (EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CRTC |
> - EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CONNECTOR)) {
> - mutex_unlock(&drm_component_lock);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CONNECTOR))
> + goto unlock;
>
> if (dev_type == EXYNOS_DEVICE_TYPE_CRTC) {
> cdev->crtc_dev = dev;
> @@ -417,14 +415,11 @@ int exynos_drm_component_add(struct device *dev,
> cdev->dev_type_flag |= dev_type;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&drm_component_lock);
> - return 0;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&drm_component_lock);
> -
> - cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cdev), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!cdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -436,10 +431,9 @@ int exynos_drm_component_add(struct device *dev,
> cdev->out_type = out_type;
> cdev->dev_type_flag = dev_type;
>
> - mutex_lock(&drm_component_lock);
> list_add_tail(&cdev->list, &drm_component_list);
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&drm_component_lock);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-20 23:54 [PATCH 1/3] drm/exynos: free DP if probe fails to find a panel or bridge Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-20 23:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/exynos: avoid race condition when adding a drm component Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-21 6:07 ` Inki Dae [this message]
2014-11-21 12:50 ` Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-20 23:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/exynos: avoid leak if exynos_dpi_probe() fails Gustavo Padovan
2014-11-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/exynos: free DP if probe fails to find a panel or bridge Ajay kumar
2014-11-23 9:22 ` Jingoo Han
2014-11-22 14:56 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-24 13:02 ` Gustavo Padovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546ED6A5.90207@samsung.com \
--to=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox