dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/vmwgfx: Don't use memory accounting for kernel-side fence objects
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:30:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547EAE23.8080308@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9typmDkEEnTrKeMe9hDH32MVp_a4gSpWgMCtHFN1AffVJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/03/2014 02:06 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 21:59, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Kernel side fence objects are used when unbinding resources and may thus be
>> created as part of a memory reclaim operation. This might trigger recursive
>> memory reclaims and result in the kernel running out of stack space.
>>
>> So a simple way out is to avoid accounting of these fence objects.
>> In principle this is OK since while user-space can trigger the creation of
>> such objects, it can't really hold on to them. However, their lifetime is
>> quite long, so some form of accounting should perhaps be implemented in the
>> future.
>>
>> Fixes kernel crashes when running, for example viewperf11 ensight-04 test 3
>> with low system memory settings.
> are these 3 intended for fixes? can you send me a git pull for them
> soon, so they don't miss Linus release.
>
> Dave.
Hi.

Actually, these bugs have been quite long-standing and I feel a bit
uncomfortable including the fixes this late in the release cycle. I'd
rather wait to 3.19 unless you think otherwise.

Thanks,
Thomas

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2014-12-03  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-02 11:59 [PATCH 1/3] drm/vmwgfx: Don't use memory accounting for kernel-side fence objects Thomas Hellstrom
2014-12-02 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/vmwgfx: Fix fence event code Thomas Hellstrom
2014-12-02 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/vmwgfx: (Re)bind shaders to MOBs with the correct offset Thomas Hellstrom
2014-12-03  1:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/vmwgfx: Don't use memory accounting for kernel-side fence objects Dave Airlie
2014-12-03  6:30   ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=547EAE23.8080308@vmware.com \
    --to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox