dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Long radeon stalls on recent kernels
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:44:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54881605.9080709@daenzer.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV6bm_g2j7EEp6cgRP4HgbUTRC5v2T4y-bQLg6NzqSnMw@mail.gmail.com>

On 10.12.2014 06:39, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
>>> On 09.12.2014 09:24, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The relevant line from latencytop seems to be:
>>>>
>>>> 154 20441402 489139 radeon_fence_default_wait [radeon]
>>>> fence_wait_timeout ttm_bo_wait [ttm] ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup [ttm]
>>>> radeon_move_blit.isra.12 [radeon] radeon_bo_move [radeon]
>>>> ttm_bo_handle_move_mem [ttm] ttm_bo_evict [ttm] ttm_mem_evict_first
>>>> [ttm] ttm_bo_mem_space [ttm] ttm_bo_validate [ttm]
>>>> radeon_bo_fault_reserve_notify [radeon]
>>>
>>> Which process is this?
>>
>> Xorg
>>
>>>
>>> Looks like CPU access to a BO in VRAM, but the BO is located outside of
>>> the CPU visible area of VRAM, so it has to be moved into the CPU visible
>>> area first.
>>>
>>> Which version of Mesa are you using?
>>>
>>
>> mesa-dri-drivers-10.3.3-1.20141110.fc20.x86_64
>>
>> I'm planning on upgrading to Fedora 21 fairly soon.
> 
> Upgrading to mesa-dri-drivers-10.3.3-1.20141110.fc21.x86_64 seems to
> have helped enough that my usual test (open a couple of Firefox tabs
> with graphics in them) doesn't hang anymore.

Hmm, since that looks like the exact same upstream version, maybe it was
actually upgrading something else that made the difference?


> This card still isn't *fast*.

I'm afraid it wasn't exactly a high-end card even when it was new. What
kind of operations are slow?


> Is there some way I can check that I'm actually using all 16 PCIe lanes?
> In my tinkering w/ power management settings, I got some odd logs
> suggesting that only one lane was in use.

You can try forcing off ASPM with radeon.aspm=0, other than that I'm not
sure.


> But I'm still waiting for the day that buggy userspace *can't* cause
> kernel graphics stalls.

Actually, this looks more like buggy userspace stalling itself. :)


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-14 22:21 Long radeon stalls on recent kernels Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-17  9:51 ` Michel Dänzer
2014-11-19  0:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-19  0:34     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-19  0:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-19  7:19     ` Michel Dänzer
2014-11-20  0:07       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-20  0:58         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-11-26  6:42           ` Michel Dänzer
2014-11-26 15:38             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-09  0:24               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-09  9:18                 ` Michel Dänzer
2014-12-09 16:06                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-09 21:39                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-10  9:44                       ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2014-12-10 20:28                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-11  4:24                           ` Michel Dänzer
2014-12-11  5:13                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-16  8:00                               ` Michel Dänzer
2014-12-10 14:56                       ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54881605.9080709@daenzer.net \
    --to=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox