From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:30:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BFE22C.1090701@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_M=WE7WBv_HH+JhCdOt-63cLGhjcmt0sr2J4vVWVnSFqw@mail.gmail.com>
Hey,
On 21-01-15 17:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:
>> Op 21-01-15 om 11:35 schreef Jammy Zhou:
>>> When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcuy,
>>> is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
>>>
>>> Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
>>> to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
>>>
>>> v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
>>>
>>> v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>>
>> Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
>
> Dave, Maarten,
>
> Do you want to pick these up, or would you rather I pulled them through my tree?
This goes through Sumit Semwal's tree. He's the dma-buf maintainer and I already made him aware of the patches.
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-21 10:35 [PATCH 1/2] reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3) Jammy Zhou
2015-01-21 10:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-01-21 16:16 ` Alex Deucher
2015-01-21 17:30 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-01-21 17:34 ` Alex Deucher
2015-01-22 10:00 ` Sumit Semwal
2015-01-21 10:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/fence: don't wait when specified timeout is zero Jammy Zhou
2015-01-21 10:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-01-21 11:09 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BFE22C.1090701@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox