From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Device loses its IRQ number on driver unload?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FEE9BD.4060308@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9twZCpTK2khD3UGg82MNCPoVy6Q63erSRMvN6YQtQwR3Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/09/2015 09:25 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 10 March 2015 at 02:02, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>> On 03/09/2015 04:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:04:01AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure this started with 4.0 but when I rmmod the device driver
>>>> like so
>>>> rmmod vmwgfx
>>>>
>>>> The device loses its IRQ line as shown in lscpi:
>>>> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64 <irq missing here>
>>>>
>>>> and a subsequent modprobe will fail since pdev->irq is 0.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone else seeing this with other drivers?
>>> I seen occasionally (over the past couple of kernels) random zeros in pdev
>>> but dismissed it as broken machines or bugs in i915 (we have them ...).
>>> Usually the box died chasing a NULL pointer from pdev. Otherwise no.
>>> -Daniel
>> OK. Thanks for the info. Since in my case this is 100% reproducible I
>> guess I have an excellent opportunity to bisect the problem :-/
>>
> does lspci -H1, or some option like to direct access hw show it?
>
> just whether this is the kernel copy or the hw register getting messed up.
>
> Dave.
Hi, Dave,
lspci -H1 indeed shows the IRQ number. It turns out that the commit
introduced in 4.0 breaking this is
b4b55cda587442477a3a9f0669e26bba4b7800c0 is the first bad commit
commit b4b55cda587442477a3a9f0669e26bba4b7800c0
Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu Feb 5 13:44:47 2015 +0800
x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ resources
It's obvious from the commit message that unloading the driver *should*
drop the irq resource but its not
obvious what's reallocating that resource on driver load...
Anyway, it turns out that adding a
pci_disable_device(pdev) in the pci driver's remove() method
(vmw_remove() in my case) appears to fix the problem:
The device irq is removed on driver unload and enabled again on driver
load There appears to be no pci_disable_device() on driver exit in core drm.
However it still beats me why other drm drivers aren't seeing this, and
IMHO that commit should probably add a warning message if the pci device
isn't disabled on pci driver unload......
/Thomas
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 10:04 Device loses its IRQ number on driver unload? Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-09 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-09 16:02 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-09 20:25 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-10 12:55 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2015-03-10 14:01 ` Alex Deucher
2015-03-10 21:05 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-11 6:40 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-11 7:22 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-11 9:28 ` Thomas Hellstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FEE9BD.4060308@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox