From: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
To: Werner Johansson <werner.johansson@gmail.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: drm/msm/dsi: hs_zero timing
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:26:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DFF7F7.3010304@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKVuvfqexJnBinbkzNKD1S3UQCUDLeq9Wh3x2_Xw2X4iaBCF9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/27/2015 07:12 AM, Werner Johansson wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2015 11:31 AM, "Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com
> <mailto:robdclark@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not completely sure.. I did observe that we calculated slightly
> > different settings w/ the auo novatek panel on z3, compared to what
> > downstream had hard-coded in dts (which presumably came from
> > magic-spreadsheet), because (I think) of rounding mode->clock to
> > integer KHz. Although in the case of the z3 panel, it didn't seem to
> > matter. What I am unsure about is whether other panels might be more
> > sensitive to different settings.
>
> Yes, the code definitely calculates different timing (as can be seen
> with the calculations for this particular Panasonic panel as well). We
> need more of the spreadsheet magic in the code it seems. This hs_zero
> issue seems to be a bug of sorts inside the MSM SoC itself though, not
> an issue with the panel (as exactly the same issue occurred with all
> three panels I tried. The "every-eighth value fails" failure mode does
> not seem to be timing related as I was able to fuzz the timing way
> outside of the specified ranges and still have perfectly good display,
> as long as I stayed out of the "every-eighth" value for hs_zero. The
> panels are typically not crystal controlled so their frequency
> tolerances are wide.
>
> The display mode seems a bit over-specified, can we derive clock from
> htotal * vtotal * refreshrate instead and get the resolution needed (for
> DSI that should always result in the correct clock, right)?
There are certain modes (generally for HDMI/DVI) where the refresh rate
isn't an integer. It can be something like 59.94 Hz, or 60.04Hz. The
above calculation may not work well with such modes.
For example, a 720p@59.94Hz mode requires 74.175 Mhz. This value can
be expressed relatively accurately in KHz if stored beforehand in
mode->clock. If we try to calculate the pixel clock here ourselves,
we'll need to round off the vrefresh to 60Hz, which gives us a less
accurate 74.25 Mhz.
We have platforms where the DSI output is connected to HDMI bridge
chips. So the issue I mentioned holds true for msm/dsi too.
Thanks,
Archit
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-28 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 18:26 drm/msm/dsi: hs_zero timing Johansson, Werner
2015-08-21 19:55 ` Hai Li
2015-08-21 20:38 ` Johansson, Werner
2015-08-22 13:25 ` Rob Clark
2015-08-24 6:17 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-24 14:32 ` Hai Li
2015-08-25 1:23 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-26 15:34 ` Hai Li
2015-08-26 17:39 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-26 17:46 ` Rob Clark
2015-08-26 18:22 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-26 18:31 ` Rob Clark
2015-08-27 1:42 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-28 5:56 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2015-08-28 6:09 ` Werner Johansson
2015-09-01 15:59 ` Hai Li
2015-09-01 16:27 ` Werner Johansson
2015-08-28 14:12 ` hali
2015-08-26 17:49 ` Hai Li
2015-08-26 18:04 ` Werner Johansson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-21 18:13 Werner Johansson
2015-08-21 1:08 Johansson, Werner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DFF7F7.3010304@codeaurora.org \
--to=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=werner.johansson@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox