From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, Rob Clark <robclark@freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm 2/2] xf86drmMode: smoke-test the atomic API
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:10:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F1653A.90306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150907130641.GZ29811@intel.com>
On 07/09/15 14:06, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> As going through the modetest patches for atomic support I've noticed
>> that if we pass NULL for the drmModeAtomicReqPtr argument we'll crash.
>>
>> So let's handle things appropriately if the user forgot to check the
>> return value of drmModeAtomicAlloc and drmModeAtomicDuplicate or made a
>> typo somewhere along the way.
>
> I'm not sure hand-holding the user to such an extent is actually useful.
From what I've gathered "smoke-testing" is not meant to be smart.
> OTOH I guess one NULL check per function call isn't all that expensive
> either.
>
This is pretty much the reason why I bothered :)
Although if anyone feels strongly against it I'll drop the patch.
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-07 9:53 [PATCH libdrm 1/2] automake: set --enable-valgrind during make distcheck Emil Velikov
2015-09-07 9:53 ` [PATCH libdrm 2/2] xf86drmMode: smoke-test the atomic API Emil Velikov
2015-09-07 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-10 11:10 ` Emil Velikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F1653A.90306@gmail.com \
--to=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robclark@freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox