From: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: a.hajda@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
airlied@linux.ie, treding@nvidia.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de,
robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:59:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56651937.1080405@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201511302050.evPZc1zs%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Hi,
On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Archit,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
depend on CONFIG_OF? Or is it better to wrap these funcs around
IF_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)?
Archit
> ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/of_modalias_node +168 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>
> 162 {
> 163 struct device *dev = host->dev;
> 164 struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { };
> 165 int ret;
> 166 u32 reg;
> 167
> > 168 if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
> 169 dev_err(dev, "modalias failure on %s\n", node->full_name);
> 170 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 171 }
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 5:24 [RFC 0/2] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-06-30 5:24 ` [RFC 1/2] drm/dsi: Create dummy DSI devices Archit Taneja
2015-08-19 8:10 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19 9:30 ` Archit Taneja
2015-06-30 5:24 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-08-19 8:46 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19 5:07 ` [RFC 0/2] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-08-19 13:13 ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 14:17 ` Lucas Stach
2015-08-19 14:34 ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 14:52 ` Lucas Stach
2015-08-19 15:02 ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 15:39 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 4:16 ` Archit Taneja
2015-08-20 11:48 ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-21 6:09 ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-07 11:46 ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-08 10:27 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-09-10 6:15 ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-10 7:32 ` Thierry Reding
2015-09-15 10:32 ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 15:43 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-17 8:56 ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 10:41 ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 0/5] " Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 1/5] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 11:28 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 12:42 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02 5:26 ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 12:52 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02 5:28 ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 14:21 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02 6:28 ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-02 10:42 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-03 7:18 ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 9:24 ` [RFC v2 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 10:00 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-02 10:50 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-03 7:20 ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:45 ` kbuild test robot
2015-12-07 5:29 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2015-12-07 8:45 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07 8:59 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07 9:10 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07 9:18 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07 16:55 ` Rob Clark
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:34 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-30 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/dsi: check for CONFIG_OF when defining of_mipi_dsi_device_add Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 15:31 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 14:59 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 15:46 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 17:05 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:05 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 18:04 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:11 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27 5:16 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:12 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27 5:20 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:16 ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27 5:21 ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-05 5:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] " Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/dsi: check for CONFIG_OF when defining of_mipi_dsi_device_add Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/dsi: Use mipi_dsi_device_register_full for DSI device creation Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT DSI devices Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister a DSI device Archit Taneja
2016-02-12 9:18 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2016-03-02 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56651937.1080405@codeaurora.org \
--to=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).