From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: EDID/DP color precision fixes on Intel hw for stable
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 19:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <572CD711.7050508@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459122767-13314-1-git-send-email-mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Ping? Could somebody give this a review? Would be good to get the
associated regressions in DVI/VGA output precision fixed in intel
hw, also for stable kernels which regressed.
Resending the three patches...
thanks,
-mario
On 03/28/2016 01:52 AM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> Bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105331
>
> received a potential fix that was backported to stable. While that
> patch itself is correct for treating DP video sinks with "unknown
> color depth", it uncovered some lack in our general EDID 1.3
> handling, and in how we treat DP->DVI/VGA, causing the fall back
> of Intel DP to 6 bpc / 18 bpp in cases where it shouldn't fall
> back. That leads to unhappy neuroscience/medical users of Intel gpus
> which need their DP->DVI or DP->VGA display devices to operate at at
> least 8 bpc without dithering.
>
> The following three patches try to improve our EDID handling and
> Intel DP to try harder to detect the proper bpc to avoid these
> regressions for DP-DVI and DP-VGA. The third patch tries to fix
> FDO bug 105331 without causing general unhappiness of other users.
>
> thanks,
> -mario
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-27 23:52 EDID/DP color precision fixes on Intel hw for stable Mario Kleiner
2016-03-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/edid: Set 8 bpc color depth for displays with "DFP 1.x compliant TMDS" Mario Kleiner
2016-05-06 17:41 ` Fwd: " Mario Kleiner
2016-03-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dp: Try to find proper bpc for DP->legacy converters Mario Kleiner
2016-05-06 17:42 ` Fwd: " Mario Kleiner
2016-03-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/edid: Add 6 bpc quirk for display AEO model 0 Mario Kleiner
2016-05-06 17:43 ` Fwd: " Mario Kleiner
2016-05-06 17:40 ` Mario Kleiner [this message]
2016-05-06 18:27 ` EDID/DP color precision fixes on Intel hw for stable Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-06 20:03 ` Mario Kleiner
2016-05-07 18:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-12 16:52 ` Mario Kleiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=572CD711.7050508@gmail.com \
--to=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox