From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: More build fixes for omapdrm in current -next Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:07:47 +0300 Message-ID: <573AD153.4060200@ti.com> References: <1462982509-342936-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0982594171==" Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.12]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C746E259 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 08:07:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1462982509-342936-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: airlied@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0982594171== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ATCMk6FfDUltJfxP1JtghCu1IBFWitoEJ" --ATCMk6FfDUltJfxP1JtghCu1IBFWitoEJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lHlXkruvMsCjtaCPCXJwusWb4rjwLngEo" From: Tomi Valkeinen To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: airlied@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <573AD153.4060200@ti.com> Subject: Re: More build fixes for omapdrm in current -next References: <1462982509-342936-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <1462982509-342936-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> --lHlXkruvMsCjtaCPCXJwusWb4rjwLngEo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/05/16 19:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > A couple more errors showed up in linux-next in the last few > days, all because of missing header files. I have not seen these > before, and most configurations appear to be fine. There > must have been an implicit inclusion somewhere before that > just got removed, but I couldn't find it and doing the > explicit #include should always be better here. Thanks. I picked the first one as is, and third one with some conflict resolutions. A patch similar to the second one was already queued. Tomi --lHlXkruvMsCjtaCPCXJwusWb4rjwLngEo-- --ATCMk6FfDUltJfxP1JtghCu1IBFWitoEJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXOtFTAAoJEPo9qoy8lh715hsQAKYPvV61aPyhWHQgo6UlOL06 z7mB0lF7ptk1VJKrOaeU8lplKzaGwec0tKAn1w5q5hodlJWPmuihXz25S0n9kGKu 0BNNfiI5ILqLz2OBJWIyNn4KNCkBS2Z0XJKAZORPWkK0H5PGVnJvkJvxGOg8Pz5m vp/+qtyjRzFiTjp+kvaOI4tMQ/rfW3OxFndACHLfWoL/8OuDN4AQt2k3aS3Gw/dc ckpyOQi0hhQeTb6lgKuJCE5iN3S7dzyZMhi7P0kzeT99FxI7LnBvHYSqpg5l695J /QKWOcV8UItlwDR4z6Ij02/FrIRhi+Zt5ShffuxIrs/5T0l/6/D3Qdq7sPqb1ZqE M3VvvqWrwD9LGyTuIFE+zFdOx+CXw9ail8Lw4vQxcm0BoEraaw/MlWTxpkZLRK6z KMZKw5N7zNN+g8ytZzvOYM8x0IJgvaU461B8hsx489YBqLqzP3jfK3alBUQubJLH r0WrqOpjpy/aNBjPl0eceDArJ39gXIjIWJSeN8iBtyCKtKIrRDJR2SFQQpaJqD9w yXVlNP/gVAVmANnIjaXPLhoA6cbHN6leWI5qsorTbSFq1DwHec30dGHojpmhsN4H fyOe7/YWE9aucYUVkAI64zDukIk2zb5t9DE6qgkCg0l+pI6r0UcaStlQJQFkZoRN dYKfyrKRlwmhVlGCQw3l =yUWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ATCMk6FfDUltJfxP1JtghCu1IBFWitoEJ-- --===============0982594171== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============0982594171==--