From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: w15303746062@163.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com,
simona@ffwll.ch, sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix dangling dmabuf entries after handle release
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 15:32:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62c256eb-1df4-4633-8040-222895b54f97@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528132932.1078483-1-w15303746062@163.com>
On 5/28/26 15:29, w15303746062@163.com wrote:
> From: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
>
> When a GEM handle already exists in the drm_prime_file_private, repeated
> calls to DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD can cause drm_prime_add_buf_handle()
> to insert multiple entries with the same handle into the handles rb_tree.
> Because the insertion walk moves left on equality, duplicate keys are
> structurally accepted by the tree.
That should never happen and would be a major bug.
All callers should check if a handler exists before calling drm_prime_add_buf_handle().
How do you see that a handle is added twice?
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Later, when the handle is released via drm_gem_release() ->
> drm_gem_object_release_handle() -> drm_prime_remove_buf_handle(), the
> latter iterates the handles tree, removes the first matching node, and
> breaks out of the loop. Any remaining duplicate nodes that share the
> same handle are left orphaned in the dmabufs tree - they are no longer
> reachable through the handles tree and are never freed.
>
> When the drm file is finally closed, drm_prime_destroy_file_private()
> triggers:
>
> WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&prime_fpriv->dmabufs));
>
> because the dmabufs tree is still non-empty. With CONFIG_PANIC_ON_WARN
> this becomes a kernel panic:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 19739 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:223 drm_prime_destroy_file_private+0x43/0x60
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...
>
> Fix this by restarting the lookup from the root of the handles tree
> after each successful removal, so that all duplicate nodes for the given
> handle are erased. The caller (drm_gem_object_release_handle) already
> holds prime_fpriv->lock, so this does not change the locking strategy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop the unnecessary mutex_lock addition, as the caller (drm_gem_object_release_handle) already holds the lock.
> - Rewrite the commit message to accurately reflect the root cause (duplicate handle insertions) rather than an assumed lack of synchronization.
> - Restart the rb_tree lookup from the root instead of breaking the loop to ensure all orphaned duplicate nodes are thoroughly removed.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> index 9b44c78cd77f..dc28df1c6698 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,10 @@ void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
>
> dma_buf_put(member->dma_buf);
> kfree(member);
> - break;
> + /* Duplicate handles may exist; restart search from root
> + * to guarantee removal of all matching entries.
> + */
> + rb = prime_fpriv->handles.rb_node;
> } else if (member->handle < handle) {
> rb = rb->rb_right;
> } else {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 8:29 [PATCH] drm/prime: Fix unsupervised rb_tree corruption in drm_prime_remove_buf_handle w15303746062
2026-05-28 9:14 ` Christian König
2026-05-28 12:40 ` w15303746062
2026-05-28 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix dangling dmabuf entries after handle release w15303746062
2026-05-28 13:32 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-05-28 13:49 ` w15303746062
2026-05-29 6:45 ` Christian König
2026-05-29 11:45 ` w15303746062
2026-05-31 7:54 ` [PATCH] drm/prime: Fix unsupervised rb_tree corruption in drm_prime_remove_buf_handle kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62c256eb-1df4-4633-8040-222895b54f97@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=w15303746062@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).