From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v2)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:28:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fa4f29f-a98e-b22b-ae0c-7df7e1bf71a7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323175149.3390801-1-jason@jlekstrand.net>
On 23/03/2021 17:51, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This API is entirely unnecessary and I'd love to get rid of it. If
> userspace wants a single timeline across multiple contexts, they can
> either use implicit synchronization or a syncobj, both of which existed
> at the time this feature landed. The justification given at the time
> was that it would help GL drivers which are inherently single-timeline.
> However, neither of our GL drivers actually wanted the feature. i965
> was already in maintenance mode at the time and iris uses syncobj for
> everything.
>
> Unfortunately, as much as I'd love to get rid of it, it is used by the
> media driver so we can't do that. We can, however, do the next-best
> thing which is to embed a syncobj in the context and do exactly what
> we'd expect from userspace internally. This isn't an entirely identical
> implementation because it's no longer atomic if userspace races with
> itself by calling execbuffer2 twice simultaneously from different
> threads. It won't crash in that case; it just doesn't guarantee any
> ordering between those two submits.
>
> Moving SINGLE_TIMELINE to a syncobj emulation has a couple of technical
> advantages beyond mere annoyance. One is that intel_timeline is no
> longer an api-visible object and can remain entirely an implementation
> detail. This may be advantageous as we make scheduler changes going
> forward. Second is that, together with deleting the CLONE_CONTEXT API,
> we should now have a 1:1 mapping between intel_context and
> intel_timeline which may help us reduce locking.
Much, much better commit message although I still fail to understand
where do you see implementation details leaking out. So for me this is
still something I'd like to get to the bottom of.
I would also mention the difference regarding fence context change.
And in general I would maintain this patch as part of a series which
ends up demonstrating the "mays" and "shoulds".
>
> v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> - Update the comment on i915_gem_context::syncobj to mention that it's
> an emulation and the possible race if userspace calls execbuffer2
> twice on the same context concurrently.
> - Wrap the checks for eb.gem_context->syncobj in unlikely()
> - Drop the dma_fence reference
> - Improved commit message
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 47 ++++---------------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 14 +++++-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 16 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> index f88bac19333ec..e094f4a1ca4cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
> #include <linux/log2.h>
> #include <linux/nospec.h>
>
> +#include <drm/drm_syncobj.h>
> +
> #include "gt/gen6_ppgtt.h"
> #include "gt/intel_context.h"
> #include "gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.h"
> @@ -224,10 +226,6 @@ static void intel_context_set_gem(struct intel_context *ce,
> ce->vm = vm;
> }
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(ce->timeline);
> - if (ctx->timeline)
> - ce->timeline = intel_timeline_get(ctx->timeline);
> -
> if (ctx->sched.priority >= I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL &&
> intel_engine_has_timeslices(ce->engine))
> __set_bit(CONTEXT_USE_SEMAPHORES, &ce->flags);
> @@ -344,8 +342,8 @@ void i915_gem_context_release(struct kref *ref)
> mutex_destroy(&ctx->engines_mutex);
> mutex_destroy(&ctx->lut_mutex);
>
> - if (ctx->timeline)
> - intel_timeline_put(ctx->timeline);
> + if (ctx->syncobj)
> + drm_syncobj_put(ctx->syncobj);
>
> put_pid(ctx->pid);
> mutex_destroy(&ctx->mutex);
> @@ -790,33 +788,11 @@ static void __assign_ppgtt(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> i915_vm_close(vm);
> }
>
> -static void __set_timeline(struct intel_timeline **dst,
> - struct intel_timeline *src)
> -{
> - struct intel_timeline *old = *dst;
> -
> - *dst = src ? intel_timeline_get(src) : NULL;
> -
> - if (old)
> - intel_timeline_put(old);
> -}
> -
> -static void __apply_timeline(struct intel_context *ce, void *timeline)
> -{
> - __set_timeline(&ce->timeline, timeline);
> -}
> -
> -static void __assign_timeline(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> - struct intel_timeline *timeline)
> -{
> - __set_timeline(&ctx->timeline, timeline);
> - context_apply_all(ctx, __apply_timeline, timeline);
> -}
> -
> static struct i915_gem_context *
> i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + int ret;
>
> if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE &&
> !HAS_EXECLISTS(i915))
> @@ -845,16 +821,13 @@ i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> }
>
> if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) {
> - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> -
> - timeline = intel_timeline_create(&i915->gt);
> - if (IS_ERR(timeline)) {
> + ret = drm_syncobj_create(&ctx->syncobj,
> + DRM_SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED,
> + NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> context_close(ctx);
> - return ERR_CAST(timeline);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
> -
> - __assign_timeline(ctx, timeline);
> - intel_timeline_put(timeline);
> }
>
> trace_i915_context_create(ctx);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> index 676592e27e7d2..df76767f0c41b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> @@ -83,7 +83,19 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
> struct i915_gem_engines __rcu *engines;
> struct mutex engines_mutex; /* guards writes to engines */
>
> - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> + /**
> + * @syncobj: Shared timeline syncobj
> + *
> + * When the SHARED_TIMELINE flag is set on context creation, we
> + * emulate a single timeline across all engines using this syncobj.
> + * For every execbuffer2 call, this syncobj is used as both an in-
> + * and out-fence. Unlike the real intel_timeline, this doesn't
> + * provide perfect atomic in-order guarantees if the client races
> + * with itself by calling execbuffer2 twice concurrently. However,
> + * if userspace races with itself, that's not likely to yield well-
> + * defined results anyway so we choose to not care.
> + */
> + struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
>
> /**
> * @vm: unique address space (GTT)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 96403130a373d..2e9748c1edddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -3295,6 +3295,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> goto err_vma;
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> +
> + fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(eb.gem_context->syncobj);
> + err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb.request, fence);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_ext;
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
I think put goes before the error bail.
> + }
> +
> if (in_fence) {
> if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_FENCE_SUBMIT)
> err = i915_request_await_execution(eb.request,
> @@ -3351,6 +3361,12 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
> fput(out_fence->file);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> + drm_syncobj_replace_fence(eb.gem_context->syncobj,
> + &eb.request->fence);
> + }
> +
> i915_request_put(eb.request);
>
> err_vma:
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 22:38 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: uAPI clean-ups part 2 Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_RINGSIZE Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-20 14:48 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 10:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-03-22 16:00 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 12:01 ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-22 16:01 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 16:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 13:00 ` [drm/i915] 014c1518e8: assertion_failure kernel test robot
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Drop the CONTEXT_CLONE API Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 11:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 14:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 14:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 15:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:24 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 9:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 9:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 13:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 17:50 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:10 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 9:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 17:44 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 16:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 19:12 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 17:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v2) Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-24 9:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-03-24 9:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 17:18 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-25 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-25 9:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 9:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-25 21:13 ` Matthew Brost
2021-03-25 22:19 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-25 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v3) Jason Ekstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fa4f29f-a98e-b22b-ae0c-7df7e1bf71a7@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).