dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v2)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:28:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fa4f29f-a98e-b22b-ae0c-7df7e1bf71a7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323175149.3390801-1-jason@jlekstrand.net>


On 23/03/2021 17:51, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This API is entirely unnecessary and I'd love to get rid of it.  If
> userspace wants a single timeline across multiple contexts, they can
> either use implicit synchronization or a syncobj, both of which existed
> at the time this feature landed.  The justification given at the time
> was that it would help GL drivers which are inherently single-timeline.
> However, neither of our GL drivers actually wanted the feature.  i965
> was already in maintenance mode at the time and iris uses syncobj for
> everything.
> 
> Unfortunately, as much as I'd love to get rid of it, it is used by the
> media driver so we can't do that.  We can, however, do the next-best
> thing which is to embed a syncobj in the context and do exactly what
> we'd expect from userspace internally.  This isn't an entirely identical
> implementation because it's no longer atomic if userspace races with
> itself by calling execbuffer2 twice simultaneously from different
> threads.  It won't crash in that case; it just doesn't guarantee any
> ordering between those two submits.
> 
> Moving SINGLE_TIMELINE to a syncobj emulation has a couple of technical
> advantages beyond mere annoyance.  One is that intel_timeline is no
> longer an api-visible object and can remain entirely an implementation
> detail.  This may be advantageous as we make scheduler changes going
> forward.  Second is that, together with deleting the CLONE_CONTEXT API,
> we should now have a 1:1 mapping between intel_context and
> intel_timeline which may help us reduce locking.

Much, much better commit message although I still fail to understand 
where do you see implementation details leaking out. So for me this is 
still something I'd like to get to the bottom of.

I would also mention the difference regarding fence context change.

And in general I would maintain this patch as part of a series which 
ends up demonstrating the "mays" and "shoulds".

> 
> v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Update the comment on i915_gem_context::syncobj to mention that it's
>     an emulation and the possible race if userspace calls execbuffer2
>     twice on the same context concurrently.
>   - Wrap the checks for eb.gem_context->syncobj in unlikely()
>   - Drop the dma_fence reference
>   - Improved commit message
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c   | 47 ++++---------------
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 14 +++++-
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 16 +++++++
>   3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> index f88bac19333ec..e094f4a1ca4cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
>   #include <linux/log2.h>
>   #include <linux/nospec.h>
>   
> +#include <drm/drm_syncobj.h>
> +
>   #include "gt/gen6_ppgtt.h"
>   #include "gt/intel_context.h"
>   #include "gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.h"
> @@ -224,10 +226,6 @@ static void intel_context_set_gem(struct intel_context *ce,
>   		ce->vm = vm;
>   	}
>   
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->timeline);
> -	if (ctx->timeline)
> -		ce->timeline = intel_timeline_get(ctx->timeline);
> -
>   	if (ctx->sched.priority >= I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL &&
>   	    intel_engine_has_timeslices(ce->engine))
>   		__set_bit(CONTEXT_USE_SEMAPHORES, &ce->flags);
> @@ -344,8 +342,8 @@ void i915_gem_context_release(struct kref *ref)
>   	mutex_destroy(&ctx->engines_mutex);
>   	mutex_destroy(&ctx->lut_mutex);
>   
> -	if (ctx->timeline)
> -		intel_timeline_put(ctx->timeline);
> +	if (ctx->syncobj)
> +		drm_syncobj_put(ctx->syncobj);
>   
>   	put_pid(ctx->pid);
>   	mutex_destroy(&ctx->mutex);
> @@ -790,33 +788,11 @@ static void __assign_ppgtt(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>   		i915_vm_close(vm);
>   }
>   
> -static void __set_timeline(struct intel_timeline **dst,
> -			   struct intel_timeline *src)
> -{
> -	struct intel_timeline *old = *dst;
> -
> -	*dst = src ? intel_timeline_get(src) : NULL;
> -
> -	if (old)
> -		intel_timeline_put(old);
> -}
> -
> -static void __apply_timeline(struct intel_context *ce, void *timeline)
> -{
> -	__set_timeline(&ce->timeline, timeline);
> -}
> -
> -static void __assign_timeline(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> -			      struct intel_timeline *timeline)
> -{
> -	__set_timeline(&ctx->timeline, timeline);
> -	context_apply_all(ctx, __apply_timeline, timeline);
> -}
> -
>   static struct i915_gem_context *
>   i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
>   {
>   	struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE &&
>   	    !HAS_EXECLISTS(i915))
> @@ -845,16 +821,13 @@ i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) {
> -		struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> -
> -		timeline = intel_timeline_create(&i915->gt);
> -		if (IS_ERR(timeline)) {
> +		ret = drm_syncobj_create(&ctx->syncobj,
> +					 DRM_SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED,
> +					 NULL);
> +		if (ret) {
>   			context_close(ctx);
> -			return ERR_CAST(timeline);
> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
>   		}
> -
> -		__assign_timeline(ctx, timeline);
> -		intel_timeline_put(timeline);
>   	}
>   
>   	trace_i915_context_create(ctx);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> index 676592e27e7d2..df76767f0c41b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> @@ -83,7 +83,19 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
>   	struct i915_gem_engines __rcu *engines;
>   	struct mutex engines_mutex; /* guards writes to engines */
>   
> -	struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> +	/**
> +	 * @syncobj: Shared timeline syncobj
> +	 *
> +	 * When the SHARED_TIMELINE flag is set on context creation, we
> +	 * emulate a single timeline across all engines using this syncobj.
> +	 * For every execbuffer2 call, this syncobj is used as both an in-
> +	 * and out-fence.  Unlike the real intel_timeline, this doesn't
> +	 * provide perfect atomic in-order guarantees if the client races
> +	 * with itself by calling execbuffer2 twice concurrently.  However,
> +	 * if userspace races with itself, that's not likely to yield well-
> +	 * defined results anyway so we choose to not care.
> +	 */
> +	struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
>   
>   	/**
>   	 * @vm: unique address space (GTT)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 96403130a373d..2e9748c1edddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -3295,6 +3295,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>   		goto err_vma;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> +		struct dma_fence *fence;
> +
> +		fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(eb.gem_context->syncobj);
> +		err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb.request, fence);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_ext;
> +		dma_fence_put(fence);

I think put goes before the error bail.

> +	}
> +
>   	if (in_fence) {
>   		if (args->flags & I915_EXEC_FENCE_SUBMIT)
>   			err = i915_request_await_execution(eb.request,
> @@ -3351,6 +3361,12 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>   			fput(out_fence->file);
>   		}
>   	}
> +
> +	if (unlikely(eb.gem_context->syncobj)) {
> +		drm_syncobj_replace_fence(eb.gem_context->syncobj,
> +					  &eb.request->fence);
> +	}
> +
>   	i915_request_put(eb.request);
>   
>   err_vma:
> 

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 22:38 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: uAPI clean-ups part 2 Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_RINGSIZE Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-20 14:48   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 10:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-03-22 16:00       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 12:01     ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-22 16:01       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 16:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Drop I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 13:00   ` [drm/i915] 014c1518e8: assertion_failure kernel test robot
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Drop the CONTEXT_CLONE API Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 11:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 14:09     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 14:32       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 14:57         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 15:31           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:24             ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23  9:46               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:43             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23  9:14               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 13:23                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-23 16:23                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 17:50                     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-19 22:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 12:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-22 16:10     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23  9:35       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-23 17:44         ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-22 16:59   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-22 19:12     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-23 17:51   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v2) Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-24  9:28     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-03-24  9:52       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24 11:36         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-24 17:18           ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-25  9:48             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-03-25  9:54               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-24  9:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-25 21:13     ` Matthew Brost
2021-03-25 22:19       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-25 22:21     ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Implement SINGLE_TIMELINE with a syncobj (v3) Jason Ekstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fa4f29f-a98e-b22b-ae0c-7df7e1bf71a7@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).