From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/vc4: Add a load tracker to prevent HVS underflow errors
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:26:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736sbo7qu.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105123648.4fe6d838@bbrezillon>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4109 bytes --]
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:12:55 -0700
> Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>> > +static void vc4_load_tracker_destroy_state(struct drm_private_obj *obj,
>> > + struct drm_private_state *state)
>> > +{
>> > + struct vc4_load_tracker_state *load_state;
>> > +
>> > + load_state = to_vc4_load_tracker_state(state);
>> > + kfree(load_state);
>> > +}
>>
>> Optional: just kfree(state) for simplicity.
>
> Hm, not sure that's a good idea. kfree(state) works as long as
> drm_private_state is the first field in vc4_load_tracker_state, but it
> sounds a bit fragile.
>
> I can do
>
> kfree(to_vc4_load_tracker_state(state));
>
> if you prefer.
I said optional for that reason :) Just keep it as is.
>> > +static void vc4_plane_calc_load(struct drm_plane_state *state)
>> > +{
>> > + unsigned int hvs_load_shift, vrefresh, i;
>> > + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->fb;
>> > + struct vc4_plane_state *vc4_state;
>> > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> > + unsigned int vscale_factor;
>> > +
>> > + vc4_state = to_vc4_plane_state(state);
>> > + crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_existing_crtc_state(state->state,
>> > + state->crtc);
>> > + vrefresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(&crtc_state->adjusted_mode);
>> > +
>> > + /* The HVS is able to process 2 pixels/cycle when scaling the source,
>> > + * 4 pixels/cycle otherwise.
>> > + * Alpha blending step seems to be pipelined and it's always operating
>> > + * at 4 pixels/cycle, so the limiting aspect here seems to be the
>> > + * scaler block.
>> > + * HVS load is expressed in clk-cycles/sec (AKA Hz).
>> > + */
>> > + if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] != VC4_SCALING_NONE ||
>> > + vc4_state->x_scaling[1] != VC4_SCALING_NONE ||
>> > + vc4_state->y_scaling[0] != VC4_SCALING_NONE ||
>> > + vc4_state->y_scaling[1] != VC4_SCALING_NONE)
>> > + hvs_load_shift = 1;
>> > + else
>> > + hvs_load_shift = 2;
>> > +
>> > + vc4_state->membus_load = 0;
>> > + vc4_state->hvs_load = 0;
>> > + for (i = 0; i < fb->format->num_planes; i++) {
>> > + unsigned long pixels_load;
>>
>> I'm scared any time I see longs. Do you want 32 or 64 bits here?
>
> I just assumed a 32bit unsigned var would be enough, so unsigned long
> seemed just fine. I can use u32 or u64 if you prefer.
Yes, please. See also Maxime's recent trouble with a 64-bit kernel.
>> > + /* Even if the bandwidth/plane required for a single frame is
>> > + *
>> > + * vc4_state->src_w[i] * vc4_state->src_h[i] * cpp * vrefresh
>> > + *
>> > + * when downscaling, we have to read more pixels per line in
>> > + * the time frame reserved for a single line, so the bandwidth
>> > + * demand can be punctually higher. To account for that, we
>> > + * calculate the down-scaling factor and multiply the plane
>> > + * load by this number. We're likely over-estimating the read
>> > + * demand, but that's better than under-estimating it.
>> > + */
>> > + vscale_factor = DIV_ROUND_UP(vc4_state->src_h[i],
>> > + vc4_state->crtc_h);
>> > + pixels_load = vc4_state->src_w[i] * vc4_state->src_h[i] *
>> > + vscale_factor;
>>
>> If we're upscaling (common for video, right?), aren't we under-counting
>> the cost? You need to scale/colorspace-convert crtc_w * crtc_h at 2
>> pixels per cycle.
>
> That's not entirely clear to me. I'm not sure what the scaler does when
> upscaling. Are the same pixels read several times from the memory? If
> that's the case, then the membus load should indeed be based on the
> crtc_w,h.
I'm going to punt on this question because that would be a *lot* of
verilog tracing to figure out for me (and I'm not sure I'd even trust
what I came up with).
> Also, when the spec says the HVS can process 4pixels/cycles, is it 4
> input pixels or 4 output pixels per cycle?
Well, it's 4 pixels per cycle when not scaling, so both :)
I think the scaling pipeline is doing two output pixels per cycle.
Nothing else would make sense to me.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 12:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/vc4: Add a load tracker Boris Brezillon
2018-10-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/atomic: Add a generic infrastructure to track underrun errors Boris Brezillon
2018-10-26 10:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-26 12:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-26 13:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-26 14:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-10-26 14:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/vc4: Report " Boris Brezillon
2018-10-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/vc4: Add a load tracker to prevent HVS underflow errors Boris Brezillon
2018-10-30 23:12 ` Eric Anholt
2018-11-05 11:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-08 16:26 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2018-11-08 16:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-08 17:53 ` Eric Anholt
2018-11-06 13:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-28 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/vc4: Add a load tracker Paul Kocialkowski
2018-11-28 9:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-28 13:32 ` Paul Kocialkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736sbo7qu.fsf@anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox