From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 2/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_device
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:45:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873d2643-db7d-bc80-b210-549355e8c7b0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5f75f4b093af650103efe3008f395c3dc7b505d.1689060814.git.karolina.stolarek@intel.com>
Am 11.07.23 um 12:34 schrieb Karolina Stolarek:
> Test initialization and cleanup of the ttm_device struct, including
> some error paths. Verify the creation of page pools if use_dma_alloc
> param is true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_device_test.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 159 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_device_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_device_test.c
> index 76d927d07501..f8c867836acf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_device_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_device_test.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,13 @@
>
> #include "ttm_kunit_helpers.h"
>
> +struct ttm_device_test_case {
> + const char *description;
> + bool use_dma_alloc;
> + bool use_dma32;
> + bool pools_init_expected;
> +};
> +
> static void ttm_device_init_basic(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct ttm_test_devices *priv = test->priv;
> @@ -37,8 +44,160 @@ static void ttm_device_init_basic(struct kunit *test)
> ttm_device_fini(ttm_dev);
> }
>
> +static void ttm_device_init_multiple(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct ttm_test_devices *priv = test->priv;
> + struct ttm_device *ttm_devs;
> + unsigned int i, num_dev = 3;
> + int err;
> +
> + ttm_devs = kunit_kcalloc(test, num_dev, sizeof(*ttm_devs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_devs);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_dev; i++) {
> + err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, &ttm_devs[i], false, false);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ttm_devs[i].dev_mapping,
> + priv->drm->anon_inode->i_mapping);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_devs[i].wq);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ttm_devs[i].funcs, &ttm_dev_funcs);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_devs[i].man_drv[TTM_PL_SYSTEM]);
> + }
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, list_count_nodes(&ttm_devs[0].device_list), num_dev);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_dev; i++)
> + ttm_device_fini(&ttm_devs[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static void ttm_device_fini_basic(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct ttm_test_devices *priv = test->priv;
> + struct ttm_device *ttm_dev;
> + struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
> + int err;
> +
> + ttm_dev = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ttm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev);
> +
> + err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, ttm_dev, false, false);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
> +
> + man = ttm_manager_type(ttm_dev, TTM_PL_SYSTEM);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, man);
> +
> + ttm_device_fini(ttm_dev);
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, man->use_type);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&man->lru[0]));
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, ttm_dev->man_drv[TTM_PL_SYSTEM]);
> +}
> +
> +static void ttm_device_init_no_vma_man(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct ttm_test_devices *priv = test->priv;
> + struct drm_device *drm = priv->drm;
> + struct ttm_device *ttm_dev;
> + struct drm_vma_offset_manager *vma_man;
> + int err;
> +
> + ttm_dev = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ttm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev);
> +
> + /* Let's pretend there's no VMA manager allocated */
> + vma_man = drm->vma_offset_manager;
> + drm->vma_offset_manager = NULL;
> +
> + err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, ttm_dev, false, false);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL);
> +
> + /* Bring the manager back for a graceful cleanup */
> + drm->vma_offset_manager = vma_man;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct ttm_device_test_case ttm_device_cases[] = {
> + {
> + .description = "No DMA allocations, no DMA32 required",
> + .use_dma_alloc = false,
> + .use_dma32 = false,
> + .pools_init_expected = false,
> + },
> + {
> + .description = "DMA allocations, DMA32 required",
> + .use_dma_alloc = true,
> + .use_dma32 = true,
> + .pools_init_expected = true,
> + },
> + {
> + .description = "No DMA allocations, DMA32 required",
> + .use_dma_alloc = false,
> + .use_dma32 = true,
> + .pools_init_expected = false,
> + },
> + {
> + .description = "DMA allocations, no DMA32 required",
> + .use_dma_alloc = true,
> + .use_dma32 = false,
> + .pools_init_expected = true,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static void ttm_device_case_desc(const struct ttm_device_test_case *t, char *desc)
> +{
> + strscpy(desc, t->description, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(ttm_device, ttm_device_cases, ttm_device_case_desc);
> +
> +static void ttm_device_init_pools(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct ttm_test_devices *priv = test->priv;
> + const struct ttm_device_test_case *params = test->param_value;
> + struct ttm_device *ttm_dev;
> + struct ttm_pool *pool;
> + struct ttm_pool_type pt;
> + int err;
> +
> + ttm_dev = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ttm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ttm_dev);
> +
> + err = ttm_device_kunit_init(priv, ttm_dev,
> + params->use_dma_alloc,
> + params->use_dma32);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
> +
> + pool = &ttm_dev->pool;
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, pool);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, pool->dev, priv->dev);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, pool->use_dma_alloc, params->use_dma_alloc);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, pool->use_dma32, params->use_dma32);
> +
> + if (params->pools_init_expected) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < TTM_NUM_CACHING_TYPES; ++i) {
> + for (int j = 0; j <= MAX_ORDER; ++j) {
> + pt = pool->caching[i].orders[j];
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, pt.pool, pool);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, pt.caching, i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, pt.order, j);
> +
> + if (params->use_dma_alloc) {
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test,
> + list_empty(&pt.pages));
> + }
Please drop the extra {} here.
Apart from that the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@amd.com>
Regards,
Christian.
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ttm_device_fini(ttm_dev);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case ttm_device_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(ttm_device_init_basic),
> + KUNIT_CASE(ttm_device_init_multiple),
> + KUNIT_CASE(ttm_device_fini_basic),
> + KUNIT_CASE(ttm_device_init_no_vma_man),
> + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(ttm_device_init_pools, ttm_device_gen_params),
> {}
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 10:34 [RFC v4 0/3] Introduce KUnit tests for TTM subsystem Karolina Stolarek
2023-07-11 10:34 ` [RFC v4 1/3] drm/ttm: Introduce KUnit tests Karolina Stolarek
2023-07-11 10:34 ` [RFC v4 2/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_device Karolina Stolarek
2023-07-11 12:45 ` Christian König [this message]
2023-07-12 6:36 ` Karolina Stolarek
2023-07-11 10:34 ` [RFC v4 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_pool Karolina Stolarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873d2643-db7d-bc80-b210-549355e8c7b0@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karolina.stolarek@intel.com \
--cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox