From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/46] ARM: pxa: stop using mach/bitfield.h Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: <878sp4oex7.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <20191018154052.1276506-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20191018154201.1276638-6-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20191018154201.1276638-6-arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:41:21 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , Daniel Mack , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Arnd Bergmann writes: > There are two identical copies of mach/bitfield.h, one for > mach-sa1100 and one for mach-pxa. The pxafb driver only > makes use of two macros, which can be trivially open-coded > in the header. > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik Cheers. -- Robert