dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Robert Tarasov <tutankhamen@chromium.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/udl: Refactor edid retreiving in UDL driver
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:55:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1h0h374.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9twJ2AZ3GNmT0rHxGS8OMgUfLSOn0Mn5KQ9MRkvM1DVrxw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 18:25, Robert Tarasov <tutankhamen@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Now drm/udl driver uses drm_do_get_edid() function to retreive and
>> validate all blocks of EDID data. Old approach had insufficient
>> validation routine and had problems with retreiving of extra blocks
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Tarasov <tutankhamen@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>
> I've posted two other udl fixes this morning to actually make my udl work again.

I've reviewed this one as well, but my rb wasn't included in the
repost. Also, there's a v2 earlier today, but I didn't have the time to
check what changed, there's no changelog.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-15  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 18:38 [PATCH] drm/udl: Refactor edid retreiving in UDL driver Robert Tarasov
2019-03-15  2:04 ` Dave Airlie
2019-03-15  9:55   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-13  1:04 Robert Tarasov
2019-03-13  9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-13 18:36   ` Robert Tarasov
2019-03-14 10:00     ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-14 10:46       ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k1h0h374.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tutankhamen@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox