From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:48:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3z25wpy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915085005.GK4740@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 06:25:54PM +0200, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> The current drm-next misses Ville's original Patch 14/19, the one i first
>> objected, then objected to my objection. It is needed to avoid actual
>> regressions. Attached a trivially rebased (v2) of Ville's patch to go on top
>> of drm-next, also as tgz in case my e-mail client mangles the patch again,
>> because it's one of those "email hates me" weeks.
>
> Oh dear, I've made a decent mess of all of this really. Picked up to make
> sure it doesn't get lost again.
After all this nice ping pong our QA has reported a bisected regression
on this commit: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84161
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 11:49 [PATCH v2 00/19] drm: More vblank on/off work ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] drm: Always reject drm_vblank_get() after drm_vblank_off() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] drm/i915: Warn if drm_vblank_get() still works " ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm: Don't clear vblank timestamps when vblank interrupt is disabled ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm: Move drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm: Have the vblank counter account for the time between vblank irq disable and drm_vblank_off() ville.syrjala
2014-09-02 19:33 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm: Avoid random vblank counter jumps if the hardware counter has been reset ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] drm: Reduce the amount of dev->vblank[crtc] in the code ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm: Fix deadlock between event_lock and vbl_lock/vblank_time_lock ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm: Fix race between drm_vblank_off() and drm_queue_vblank_event() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] drm: Disable vblank interrupt immediately when drm_vblank_offdelay<0 ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] drm: Add dev->vblank_disable_immediate flag ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: Opt out of vblank disable timer on >gen2 ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] drm: Kick start vblank interrupts at drm_vblank_on() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm: Don't update vblank timestamp when the counter didn't change ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 12:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-04 12:14 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-09-13 16:25 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-09-15 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-09-23 12:48 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-09-23 13:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-09-23 14:15 ` Mario Kleiner
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm: Update vblank->last in drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 11:49 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm: Store the vblank timestamp when adjusting the counter during disable ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Clear .last vblank count before drm_vblank_off() when sanitizing crtc state ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-08-06 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915: Update scanline_offset only for active crtcs ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm: Fix confusing debug message in drm_update_vblank_count() ville.syrjala
2014-08-06 11:50 ` [PATCH igt] tests/kms_flip: Assert that vblank timestamps aren't zeroed ville.syrjala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r3z25wpy.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).