dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>,
	Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>, Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC 07/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helper for finding payloads in atomic MST state
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:22:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8sjppts.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607192933.1333228-8-lyude@redhat.com>

On Tue, 07 Jun 2022, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> We already open-code this quite often, and will be iterating through
> payloads even more once we've moved all of the payload tracking into the
> atomic state. So, let's add a helper for doing this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 109 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index ec52f91b1f0e..0bc2c7a90c37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -1737,6 +1737,19 @@ drm_dp_mst_dump_port_topology_history(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) {}
>  #define save_port_topology_ref(port, type)
>  #endif
>  
> +static struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *
> +drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state,
> +				 struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> +{
> +	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(payload, &state->payloads, next)
> +		if (payload->port == port)
> +			return payload;
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb =
> @@ -4381,39 +4394,31 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  				  int pbn_div)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> -	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos, *payload = NULL;
> -	int prev_slots, prev_bw, req_slots;
> +	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload = NULL;
> +	int prev_slots = 0, prev_bw = 0, req_slots;
>  
>  	topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
>  	if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
>  		return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
>  
>  	/* Find the current allocation for this port, if any */
> -	list_for_each_entry(pos, &topology_state->payloads, next) {
> -		if (pos->port == port) {
> -			payload = pos;
> -			prev_slots = payload->time_slots;
> -			prev_bw = payload->pbn;
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * This should never happen, unless the driver tries
> -			 * releasing and allocating the same timeslot allocation,
> -			 * which is an error
> -			 */
> -			if (WARN_ON(!prev_slots)) {
> -				drm_err(mgr->dev,
> -					"cannot allocate and release time slots on [MST PORT:%p] in the same state\n",
> -					port);
> -				return -EINVAL;
> -			}
> +	payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(topology_state, port);
> +	if (payload) {
> +		prev_slots = payload->time_slots;
> +		prev_bw = payload->pbn;
>  
> -			break;
> +		/*
> +		 * This should never happen, unless the driver tries
> +		 * releasing and allocating the same timeslot allocation,
> +		 * which is an error
> +		 */
> +		if (WARN_ON(!prev_slots)) {
> +			drm_err(mgr->dev,
> +				"cannot allocate and release time slots on [MST PORT:%p] in the same state\n",
> +				port);

I guess I'd combine the WARN_ON() and drm_err() to a single
drm_WARN(). Having both is a silly. But can be a follow-up, not part of
this patch really.


> +			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	if (!payload) {
> -		prev_slots = 0;
> -		prev_bw = 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (pbn_div <= 0)
>  		pbn_div = mgr->pbn_div;
> @@ -4474,30 +4479,24 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  				     struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> -	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
> -	bool found = false;
> +	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
>  
>  	topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
>  	if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
>  		return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(pos, &topology_state->payloads, next) {
> -		if (pos->port == port) {
> -			found = true;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	if (WARN_ON(!found)) {
> +	payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(topology_state, port);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!payload)) {
>  		drm_err(mgr->dev, "No payload for [MST PORT:%p] found in mst state %p\n",
>  			port, &topology_state->base);

Ditto.

BR,
Jani.

>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> 0\n", port, pos->time_slots);
> -	if (pos->time_slots) {
> +	drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> 0\n", port, payload->time_slots);
> +	if (payload->time_slots) {
>  		drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(port);
> -		pos->time_slots = 0;
> -		pos->pbn = 0;
> +		payload->time_slots = 0;
> +		payload->pbn = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -5194,18 +5193,8 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) {
> -		bool found = false;
> -
> -		list_for_each_entry(payload, &state->payloads, next) {
> -			if (payload->port != port)
> -				continue;
> -			if (!payload->pbn)
> -				return 0;
> -
> -			found = true;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -		if (!found)
> +		payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(state, port);
> +		if (!payload)
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -5360,34 +5349,26 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  				 bool enable)
>  {
>  	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> -	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
> -	bool found = false;
> +	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
>  	int time_slots = 0;
>  
>  	mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, port->mgr);
> -
>  	if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
>  		return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(pos, &mst_state->payloads, next) {
> -		if (pos->port == port) {
> -			found = true;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!found) {
> +	payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, port);
> +	if (!payload) {
>  		drm_dbg_atomic(state->dev,
>  			       "[MST PORT:%p] Couldn't find payload in mst state %p\n",
>  			       port, mst_state);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (pos->dsc_enabled == enable) {
> +	if (payload->dsc_enabled == enable) {
>  		drm_dbg_atomic(state->dev,
>  			       "[MST PORT:%p] DSC flag is already set to %d, returning %d time slots\n",
> -			       port, enable, pos->time_slots);
> -		time_slots = pos->time_slots;
> +			       port, enable, payload->time_slots);
> +		time_slots = payload->time_slots;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (enable) {
> @@ -5399,7 +5380,7 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	pos->dsc_enabled = enable;
> +	payload->dsc_enabled = enable;
>  
>  	return time_slots;
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-07 19:29 [RESEND RFC 00/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Drop Radeon MST support, make MST atomic-only Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 01/18] drm/amdgpu/dc/mst: Rename dp_mst_stream_allocation(_table) Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 02/18] drm/amdgpu/dm/mst: Rename get_payload_table() Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 03/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_vcpi_allocation Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 04/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots Lyude Paul
2022-06-15  4:28   ` Lin, Wayne
2022-08-02 21:29     ` Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 05/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Fix confusing docs for drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 06/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add some missing kdocs for atomic MST structs Lyude Paul
2022-06-15  4:43   ` Lin, Wayne
2022-08-08 23:07     ` Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 07/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helper for finding payloads in atomic MST state Lyude Paul
2022-06-29 13:22   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 08/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add nonblocking helpers for DP MST Lyude Paul
2022-06-29 13:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 09/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Don't open code modeset checks for releasing time slots Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 10/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Fix modeset tracking in drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots() Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 11/18] drm/nouveau/kms: Cache DP encoders in nouveau_connector Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 12/18] drm/nouveau/kms: Pull mst state in for all modesets Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 13/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helpers for serializing SST <-> MST transitions Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 14/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Drop all ports from topology on CSNs before queueing link address work Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 15/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Skip releasing payloads if last connected port isn't connected Lyude Paul
2022-07-05  8:45   ` Lin, Wayne
2022-08-02 22:12     ` Lyude Paul
2022-08-10  3:28       ` Lin, Wayne
2022-08-10 22:13         ` Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 16/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Maintain time slot allocations when deleting payloads Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 17/18] drm/radeon: Drop legacy MST support Lyude Paul
2022-06-07 20:48   ` Alex Deucher
2022-06-07 19:29 ` [RESEND RFC 18/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Move all payload info into the atomic state Lyude Paul
2022-07-05  9:10   ` Lin, Wayne
2022-07-06 21:57     ` Lyude Paul
2022-08-03 20:27     ` Lyude Paul
2022-08-08 10:02       ` Lin, Wayne
2022-08-08 22:53         ` Lyude Paul
2022-06-29 13:33 ` [RESEND RFC 00/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Drop Radeon MST support, make MST atomic-only Jani Nikula
2022-07-28 22:21 ` Lyude Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8sjppts.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com \
    --cc=Jerry.Zuo@amd.com \
    --cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).