From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe <Alexandru-Cosmin.Gheorghe@arm.com>
Cc: nd@arm.com, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hwc v1] [RFC] drm_hwcomposer: Flatten composition using writeback connector
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:48:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87woy577kw.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGsPj1D-=Z1HxGxhy14DES=sy13jvyKq4QNMSH63QWKxBg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3667 bytes --]
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
> <Alexandru-Cosmin.Gheorghe@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:00:17AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:21:20PM +0000, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>>> > This patchset tries to add support for using writeback connector to
>>> > flatten a scene when it doesn't change for a while. This idea had
>>> > been floated around on IRC here [1] and here [2].
>>> >
>>> > Developed on top of the latest writeback series, sent by Liviu here
>>> > [3].
>>> >
>>> > Probably the patch should/could be broken in more patches, but since I
>>> > want to put this out there to get feedback, I kept them as a single
>>> > patch for now.
>>> >
>>> > This change could be summarize as follow:
>>> > - Attach a writeback connector to the CRTC that's controlling a
>>> > display.
>>> > - Detect the scene did not change for a while(60 vblanks).
>>> > - Re-commit scene and get the composited scene through the writeback
>>> > connector.
>>> > - Commit the whole scene as a single plane.
>>> >
>>> > Some areas that I consider important and I could use some
>>> > feedback/ideas:
>>> >
>>> > 1. Building the pipeline.
>>> > Currently, drm_hwcomposer allows to connect just a single connector
>>> > to a crtc. For now, I decided to treat the writeback connector as a
>>> > separate field inside DrmCrtc. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to try
>>> > to handle this in a unified way, since the writeback connector is such
>>> > a special connector. Regarding the allocation of writeback connectors,
>>> > my idea was to allocate writeback connector to the primary display
>>> > first and then continue allocating while respecting the display number. 0
>>> > gets a writeback before 1 and so on.
>>> >
>>> > 2. Heuristic for triggering the flattening.
>>> > I just created a VSyncWorker which will trigger the flattening of the
>>> > scene if it doesn't change for 60 consecutive vsyncs. The countdown
>>> > gets reset every time ValidateDisplay is called. This is a relatively
>>> > basic heuristic, so I'm open to suggestions.
>>> >
>>> > 3. Locking scheme corner cases.
>>> > The Vsynworker is a separate thread which will contend with
>>> > SurfaceFlinger for showing things on the screen. I tried to limit the
>>> > race window by resetting the countdown on ValidateDisplay and
>>> > explicitely checking that we still need to use the flatten scene before
>>> > commiting to get the writeback result or before applying the flattened
>>> > scene.
>>>
>>> What are the consequences of the race? It seems like it might be possible that
>>> stale content will be shown over fresh?
>>> I think it'd be fine to serialize
>>> vsyncworker and "normal" commits such that the race window is closed instead of
>>> reduced. I think you could do the writeback operation asynchronously and then
>>> commit the result once it's ready, that shouldn't block things up too much.
>>>
>>
>> Just, to make sure we are on the same page, for Mali DP650 the pipeline
>> looks like this, I didn't see how it looks for the other hardware.
>>
>> CRTC ---- encoder ------------ display connector
>> |------- writeback enc ------ writeback connector.
>>
>> There is no asynchronously writeback operation, the scene that you
>> do writeback for will be shown on the display as well.
>>
>
> fwiw, the msm/mdp5 writeback support I implemented was using a
> different CRTC (ie. output going either to display or to wb).. (which
> unfortunately implies using different planes).. not sure how much this
> case is worth supporting in drm-hwc.
This is also how VC4's writeback would work.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-21 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 16:21 [PATCH hwc v1] [RFC] drm_hwcomposer: Flatten composition using writeback connector Alexandru Gheorghe
2018-03-13 18:20 ` Stefan Schake
2018-03-14 9:42 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-19 18:03 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-20 11:26 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-20 13:28 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-20 13:35 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-20 13:43 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-20 13:51 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-20 14:00 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-20 15:16 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-20 19:53 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-21 3:35 ` Rob Clark
2018-03-21 14:01 ` Sean Paul
2018-03-21 15:13 ` Alexandru-Cosmin Gheorghe
2018-03-21 15:39 ` Liviu Dudau
2018-03-21 15:48 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87woy577kw.fsf@anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=Alexandru-Cosmin.Gheorghe@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox