From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: moosotc@gmail.com, Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/dp: Adjust i2c-over-aux retry count based on message size and i2c bus speed
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:29:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4gq4hdu.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901091443.GJ1367@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:55:06PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Calculate the number of retries we should do for each i2c-over-aux
>> message based on the time it takes to perform the i2c transfer vs. the
>> aux transfer. We assume the shortest possible length for the aux
>> transfer, and the longest possible (exluding clock stretching) for the
>> i2c transfer.
>>
>> The DP spec has some examples on how to calculate this, but we don't
>> calculate things quite the same way. The spec doesn't account for the
>> retry interval (assumes immediate retry on defer), and doesn't assume
>> the best/worst case behaviour as we do.
>>
>> Note that currently we assume 10 kHz speed for the i2c bus. Some real
>> world devices (eg. some Apple DP->VGA dongle) fails with less than 16
>> retries. and that would correspond to something close to 15 kHz (with
>> our method of calculating things) But let's just go for 10 kHz to be
>> on the safe side. Ideally we should query/set the i2c bus speed via
>> DPCD but for now this should at leaast remove the regression from the
>> 1->16 byte trasnfer size change. And of course if the sink completes
>> the transfer quicker this shouldn't slow things down since we don't
>> change the interval between retries.
>>
>> I did a few experiments with a DP->DVI dongle I have that allows you
>> to change the i2c bus speed. Here are the results of me changing the
>> actual bus speed and the assumed bus speed and seeing when we start
>> to fail the operation:
>>
>> actual i2c khz assumed i2c khz max retries
>> 1 1 ok -> 2 fail 211 ok -> 106 fail
>> 5 8 ok -> 9 fail 27 ok -> 24 fail
>> 10 17 ok -> 18 fail 13 ok -> 12 fail
>> 100 210 ok -> 211 fail 2 ok -> 1 fail
>>
>> So based on that we have a fairly decent safety margin baked into
>> the formula to calculate the max number of retries.
>>
>> Fixes a regression with some DP dongles from:
>> commit 1d002fa720738bcd0bddb9178e9ea0773288e1dd
>> Author: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
>> Date: Tue Feb 10 18:38:08 2015 +0000
>>
>> drm/dp: Use large transactions for I2C over AUX
>>
>> v2: Use best case for AUX and worst case for i2c (Simon Farnsworth)
>> Add a define our AUX retry interval and account for it
>>
>> Cc: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.com>
>> Cc: moosotc@gmail.com
>> Tested-by: moosotc@gmail.com
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91451
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
>> index 7069e54..23b9fcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
>> @@ -424,6 +424,78 @@ static u32 drm_dp_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>> I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR;
>> }
>>
>> +#define AUX_PRECHARGE_LEN 10 /* 10 to 16 */
>> +#define AUX_SYNC_LEN (16 + 4) /* preamble + AUX_SYNC_END */
>> +#define AUX_STOP_LEN 4
>> +#define AUX_CMD_LEN 4
>> +#define AUX_ADDRESS_LEN 20
>> +#define AUX_REPLY_PAD_LEN 4
>> +#define AUX_LENGTH_LEN 8
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Calculate the length of the AUX request/reply. Gives the "best"
>> + * case estimate, ie. successful while as short as possible.
>> + */
>> +static int drm_dp_aux_req_len(const struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + int len = AUX_PRECHARGE_LEN + AUX_SYNC_LEN + AUX_STOP_LEN +
>> + AUX_CMD_LEN + AUX_ADDRESS_LEN + AUX_LENGTH_LEN;
>> +
>> + if ((msg->request & DP_AUX_I2C_READ) == 0)
>> + len += msg->size * 8;
>> +
>> + return len;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int drm_dp_aux_reply_len(const struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + int len = AUX_PRECHARGE_LEN + AUX_SYNC_LEN + AUX_STOP_LEN +
>> + AUX_CMD_LEN + AUX_REPLY_PAD_LEN;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For read we expect what was asked. For writes there will
>> + * be 0 or 1 data bytes. Assume 0 for the "best" case.
>> + */
>> + if (msg->request & DP_AUX_I2C_READ)
>> + len += msg->size * 8;
>> +
>> + return len;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define I2C_START_LEN 1
>> +#define I2C_STOP_LEN 1
>> +#define I2C_ADDR_LEN 9 /* ADDRESS + R/W + ACK/NACK */
>> +#define I2C_DATA_LEN 9 /* DATA + ACK/NACK */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer (in AUX clocks)
>> + * assuming the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the
>> + * "worst" case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible.
>> + * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
>> + * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it
>> + * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching.
>> + */
>> +static int drm_dp_i2c_msg_len(const struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg,
>> + int i2c_speed_khz)
>> +{
>> + return (I2C_START_LEN + I2C_ADDR_LEN + msg->size * I2C_DATA_LEN +
>> + I2C_STOP_LEN) * 1000 / i2c_speed_khz;
>
> This doesn't seem to compute the lenght, but the time a transfer takes, in
> usec (if I haven't screwed up my numbers ...). Also DIV_ROUND_DOWN to make
> the defensiveness clear?
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Deterine how many retries should be attempted to successfully transfer
>
> Deteri_m_e.
Determine. :)
>
>> + * the specified message, based on the estimated durations of the
>> + * i2c and AUX transfers.
>> + */
>> +static int drm_dp_i2c_retry_count(const struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg,
>> + int i2c_speed_khz)
>> +{
>> + int aux_len = drm_dp_aux_req_len(msg) + drm_dp_aux_reply_len(msg);
>> + int i2c_len = drm_dp_i2c_msg_len(msg, i2c_speed_khz);
>> +
>> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_len, aux_len + AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL);
>
> So assuming I get things right i2c_len is actually i2c_time_us, but
> aux_len is still just a length (and since the bus runs at 2MHz it doesn't
> seem to just add up correctly). But AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL is in usec (and I
> expected an usec/usec division for the ration). I think there's a
> aux_time_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(aux_len * 1000 * 1000 / aux_speed_HZ) missing.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Transfer a single I2C-over-AUX message and handle various error conditions,
>> * retrying the transaction as appropriate. It is assumed that the
>> @@ -436,13 +508,18 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
>> {
>> unsigned int retry, defer_i2c;
>> int ret;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DP1.2 sections 2.7.7.1.5.6.1 and 2.7.7.1.6.6.1: A DP Source device
>> * is required to retry at least seven times upon receiving AUX_DEFER
>> * before giving up the AUX transaction.
>> + *
>> + * We also try to account for the i2c bus speed.
>> + * FIXME currently assumes 10 kHz as some real world devices seem
>> + * to require it. We should query/set the speed via DPCD if supported.
>> */
>> - for (retry = 0, defer_i2c = 0; retry < (7 + defer_i2c); retry++) {
>> + int max_retries = max(7, drm_dp_i2c_retry_count(msg, 10));
>> +
>> + for (retry = 0, defer_i2c = 0; retry < (max_retries + defer_i2c); retry++) {
>> mutex_lock(&aux->hw_mutex);
>> ret = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
>> mutex_unlock(&aux->hw_mutex);
>> --
>> 2.4.6
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 14:56 [PATCH] drm/dp: Adjust i2c-over-aux retry count based on message size and i2c bus speed ville.syrjala
2015-08-25 15:10 ` ville.syrjala
2015-08-25 15:48 ` moosotc
2015-08-26 11:11 ` simon.farnsworth
2015-08-26 11:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-26 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp: Define AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL as 500 us ville.syrjala
2015-08-26 19:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/dp: Adjust i2c-over-aux retry count based on message size and i2c bus speed ville.syrjala
2015-09-01 9:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-01 9:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-09-01 11:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-01 15:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-01 15:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-02 13:21 ` Jani Nikula
2015-09-01 17:12 ` [PATCH v3 " ville.syrjala
2015-09-01 17:26 ` moosotc
2015-08-26 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp: Add dp_aux_i2c_speed_khz module param to set the assume " ville.syrjala
2015-08-26 21:23 ` Simon Farnsworth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4gq4hdu.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=moosotc@gmail.com \
--cc=simon.farnsworth@onelan.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox