From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma: Drop cma_get_name()
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:59:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fff4340-368f-4e66-8839-1d54eea301f9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206142550.62bed7715692ddc0071da7d0@linux-foundation.org>
On 2/7/24 03:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:45:18 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> cma_get_name() just returns cma->name without any additional transformation
>> unlike other helpers such as cma_get_base() and cma_get_size(). This helper
>> is not worth the additional indirection, and can be dropped after replacing
>> directly with cma->name in the sole caller __add_cma_heap().
>
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c: In function '__add_cma_heap':
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c:379:28: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct cma'
> 379 | exp_info.name = cma->name;
> | ^~
>
> Fixing this would require moving the `struct cma' definition into
> cma.h. I don't think that's worthwhile.
Existing forward declaration e.g 'struct cma' inside include/linux/cma.h does
not seem to sufficient for cma->name to be de-referenced. Agreed - moving the
definition for 'struct cma' into include/linux/cma.h is not worthwhile. Hence
please drop this patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 4:15 [PATCH] mm/cma: Drop cma_get_name() Anshuman Khandual
2024-02-06 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2024-02-07 2:29 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fff4340-368f-4e66-8839-1d54eea301f9@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).