dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:15:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <991045e8250f328eef71c4d3036bdfd6b98cc3a8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210212906.GN9144@intel.com>

On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT
> > bit to
> > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
> 
> It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it
> should always be set?
> 
The table defining request commands (2-148) has the MOT bit set for
Write_Status_Update_Request, doesn't make it look like an option when
querying the status. Checking the callers again, I see that we could
get a defer when ending an i2c transaction and that will require a
Write_Status_Update_Request with MOT unset. Sorry for the noise.




> > 
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain
> > partial I2C_WRITE requests")
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 2d6c491a0542..d98805b517f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void
> > drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  	 * rest of the message
> >  	 */
> >  	if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE) {
> > -		msg->request &= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> > +		msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> >  		msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE;
> >  	}
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10 21:07 [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-10 21:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-12-10 21:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-12-10 22:15   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-12-11 13:22     ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=991045e8250f328eef71c4d3036bdfd6b98cc3a8.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox