From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Skeggs Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: remove limit on gart Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:48:31 +1000 Message-ID: References: <51BF0A75.5080803@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51BF0A75.5080803@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Most graphics cards nowadays have a multiple of this limit as their vram, so > limiting GART doesn't seem to make much sense. Pushed, thanks :) > > Signed-off-by: Maarten >Lnkhorst > --- > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c > index 3a5e19a..41ddecd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c > @@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ nouveau_gart_manager_new(struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man, > struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = nouveau_bo(bo); > struct nouveau_mem *node; > > - if (unlikely((mem->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >= 512 * 1024 * 1024)) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!node) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -406,8 +403,6 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm) > /* GART init */ > if (drm->agp.stat != ENABLED) { > drm->gem.gart_available = nouveau_vmmgr(drm->device)->limit; > - if (drm->gem.gart_available > 512 * 1024 * 1024) > - drm->gem.gart_available = 512 * 1024 * 1024; > } else { > drm->gem.gart_available = drm->agp.size; > } > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel