From: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Mikko Perttunen" <cyndis@kapsi.fi>
Cc: "Mikko Perttunen" <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: Skip reset assert on Tegra186
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 17:31:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZ976COWNF9P.9CWFVDV5ZKAY@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cea93e4c-f6f0-4017-89b5-30e3d7b482dc@kapsi.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1322 bytes --]
On Mon Feb 19, 2024 at 3:18 AM CET, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 2/16/24 19:02, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed Feb 14, 2024 at 12:40 PM CET, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> >> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> On Tegra186, other software components may rely on the kernel to
> >> keep Host1x operational even during suspend. As such, as a quirk,
> >> skip asserting Host1x's reset on Tegra186.
> >
> > This all sounds a bit vague. What other software components rely on the
> > kernel to keep host1x operational during suspend? And why do they do so?
> > Why is this not a problem elsewhere?
>
> My assumption is that it's due to a secure world application accessing
> NVDEC or display engines during suspend or resume. This happening
> without kernel knowledge is a bad thing, but it's hard to change at this
> point.
>
> The reset line (CAR vs BPMP vs non-accessible reset line), and the
> secure application code programming this stuff is slightly different in
> every chip generation, which is where I think the differences happen.
*sigh*
I guess it is what it is. Please add a bit more background information
to the commit message and also a comment for the skip_reset field so
that people (including myself) will remember down the road why this
exists.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 11:40 [PATCH] gpu: host1x: Skip reset assert on Tegra186 Mikko Perttunen
2024-02-15 11:07 ` Jon Hunter
2024-02-16 10:02 ` Thierry Reding
2024-02-19 2:18 ` Mikko Perttunen
2024-02-19 16:31 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-22 1:05 Mikko Perttunen
2024-02-22 18:06 ` Thierry Reding
2024-02-24 6:02 ` Mikko Perttunen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CZ976COWNF9P.9CWFVDV5ZKAY@gmail.com \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=cyndis@kapsi.fi \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox