Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/bridge: handle gracefully atomic updates during bridge removal

["Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>]

Hello,

On Fri Nov 28, 2025 at 11:07 AM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>> +Cc Emanuele, Francesco, João
>>
>> On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 7:35 PM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:34:33 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> >> This is a first attempt at gracefully handling the case of atomic updates
>> >> happening concurrently to physical removal of DRM bridges.
>> >>
>> >> This is part of the work to support hotplug of DRM bridges. The grand plan
>> >> was discussed in [1].
>> >>
>> >> [ ... ]
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing!
>>
>> Two alternative patches [0][1] have been sent to address the issue with
>> PLL_UNLOCK, and both would conflict with patch 2 of this series. So I'd
>> keep this series on hold for a while, waiting for a decision to be taken
>> about how the PLL_UNLOCK issue will be handled. I'll then rebase this
>> series as needed.
>
> Yep, agreed.

Turns out the patch that got applied does not conflict with this series,
out of luck with the code layout.

So I'm applying this one today.

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com