From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Farah Kassabri <fkassabri@habana.ai>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] habanalabs: Timestamps buffers registration
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:54:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y701zVEvafJdWgOL@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR02MB52357E1350CD36360D2E91F8ADFE9@AM0PR02MB5235.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:07:33PM +0000, Farah Kassabri wrote:
> > 2171 {
> > 2172 struct hl_ts_buff *ts_buff = NULL;
> > 2173 u32 size, num_elements;
> > 2174 void *p;
> > 2175
> > 2176 num_elements = *(u32 *)args;
> >
> > This business of passing void pointers and pretending that
> > hl_cb_mmap_mem_alloc() and hl_ts_alloc_buf() are the same function is a
> > nightmare.
> >
> > Create two ->alloc functions. Split hl_mmap_mem_buf_alloc() into one
> > function that allocates idr stuff. Create a function to free/remove the idr
> > stuff. Create two new helper function that call the idr function and then the
> > appropriate alloc() function.
> >
> > It will be much cleaner than using a void pointer.
>
> I'm not sure I understood your intention.
> What void pointers are you referring to ? the args in this line rc = buf->behavior->alloc(buf, gfp, args); ?
> If yes what's so bad about it, it much simpler to have one common function and call specific implementation through pointers.
> BTW same goes to the map function also, not just the alloc (each behavior has alloc and map method)
>
Yeah, you're right. I didn't look at this carefully. I'm sorry.
> >
> > 2177
> > --> 2178 ts_buff = kzalloc(sizeof(*ts_buff), GFP_KERNEL);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^ Smatch is correct that it should be
> > used here.
>
> Sure will be fixed.
>
> >
> > 2179 if (!ts_buff)
> > 2180 return -ENOMEM;
> > 2181
> > 2182 /* Allocate the user buffer */
> > 2183 size = num_elements * sizeof(u64);
> >
> > Can this have an integer overflow on 32bit systems?
>
> I'll define "size" as size_t instead of u32.
>
This can't actually overflow because it's checked in the caller.
Perhaps the careful way to write this is to change size to size_t as you
suggest which fixes the issue for 64bit systems and use size_mul() so it
doesn't overflow on 32bit systems either.
size = size_mul(num_elements, sizeof(u64));
But it doesn't really matter either way because num_elements is capped
in the caller.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 8:32 [bug report] habanalabs: Timestamps buffers registration Dan Carpenter
2023-01-09 15:07 ` Farah Kassabri
2023-01-10 9:54 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y701zVEvafJdWgOL@kadam \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=fkassabri@habana.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox