From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Grace An <gracan@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
pdhaval@codeaurora.org, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
aravindh@codeaurora.org,
freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm: return int error code from mode_fixup
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:34:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YO3qyktHXds+4vql@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGcwLmvyPB1Z2HyOQg3bHYev5J=ad8Cjj=AQMVTTSHPNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:14 PM Grace An <gracan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is defined, the kernel randomly injects
> > -EDEADLK errors for all the ww_mutex. This results in
> > drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state randomly returning -EDEADLK.
> > However, the mode_fixup functions do not propagate these error
> > codes and return false, causing the atomic commit to fail with
> > -EINVAL instead of retrying.
> >
> > Change encoder, crtc, and bridge mode_fixup functions to return
> > an int instead of a boolean to indicate success or failure. If
> > any of these functions fail, the mode_fixup function now returns
> > the provided integer error code instead of -EINVAL.
> >
> > This change needs modifications across drivers, but before submitting
> > the entire change, we want to get feedback on this RFC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grace An <gracan@codeaurora.org>
>
> Why don't you just use the various atomic_check hooks we have for
> this? There you get passed the state and everything, have a full int
> return value, and things actually work.
>
> ->mode_fixup is for compatibility with legacy crtc modeset helpers
> from the pre-atomic times. If the kerneldoc isn't clear yet, please do
> a patch to fix that up so that @mode_fixup points at the relevant
> @atomic_check as the recommended function.
Agreed, and we need to document this better.
I have posted the following patch to make it more obvious that
mode_fixup is deprecated.
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210713193257.958852-1-sam@ravnborg.org/T/#u
Sam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 17:13 [RFC] drm: return int error code from mode_fixup Grace An
2021-07-13 17:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-13 19:34 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YO3qyktHXds+4vql@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=aravindh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gracan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khsieh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pdhaval@codeaurora.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox