From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76355C432BE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D244960C41 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D244960C41 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ravnborg.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E766E42A; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.smtp.larsendata.com (mx2.smtp.larsendata.com [91.221.196.228]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425816E42A for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.mxhotel.dk (mail01.mxhotel.dk [91.221.196.236]) by mx2.smtp.larsendata.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 7ee84c28-ed6a-11eb-8d1a-0050568cd888; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ravnborg.org (80-162-45-141-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [80.162.45.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sam@ravnborg.org) by mail01.mxhotel.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B653194B77; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:05:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:05:02 +0200 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@mxhotel.dk From: Sam Ravnborg To: Jagan Teki Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] drm: bridge: Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge Message-ID: References: <20210704090230.26489-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210704090230.26489-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marek Vasut , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Joonyoung Shim , Neil Armstrong , linux-amarula , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Seung-Woo Kim , Robert Foss , Frieder Schrempf , Andrzej Hajda , Kyungmin Park , Laurent Pinchart , Daniel Vetter , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, NXP Linux Team Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Hi Jagan, On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 02:32:13PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > This series supports common bridge support for Samsung MIPI DSIM > which is used in Exynos and i.MX8MM SoC's. > > The final bridge supports both the Exynos and i.MX8MM DSI devices. > > Right now bridge offers two sets of implementations. > > A. With component_ops and exynos specific code exclusively for >    exynos dsi drivers and it's legacy bindings. > > B. Without componenet_ops for newly implemented bridges and its >    users like i.MX8MM. > > The future plan is to fix the implementation A) by dropping > component_ops and fixing exynos specific code in order to make > the bridge more mature to use and the same is mentioned in > drivers TODO. > > Patch 0001 - 0006: Bridge conversion > Patch 0007 - 0017: Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge fixes, additions > > Tested in Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SoM. > > Anyone interest, please have a look on this repo > https://github.com/openedev/linux/tree/070421-imx8mm-dsim > > Would appreciate anyone from the exynos team to test it on > the exynos platform? > > Any inputs? I really like where you are headign with this! No testing - sorry. But I will try to provide a bit of feedback on the individual patches. I hope you find a way to move forward with this. Sam