From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE41C02199 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0A010E050; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="s3u3/Kcr"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4202510E050; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB030A40112; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77C26C4CEDD; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:36:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739115377; bh=FvCj1o+rQVPjPQfvnsYB6OfB+ebTUMelN1NPIRKfUm4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=s3u3/KcrtcmIGEy9zQ+pS9GBhOCxOuldNX/8M+/psbsFCAR6k6mkrkQQ9tHoeTmBW xLRk+P6+mfsLvmCdpHCspa8cMK571tlYmUywNj0C///BrtXiScEwUtwJqwgMRtgPGe /fACA1T6a3bgLvo8RzV6fTpMtCrC4+a5nxWpNfit5mQqO8OZ8D8hGMsSlSBURAHAoL Tq7Tl0+9E0NWrnDXegjJrCXYT1hCc9oTKdsmaSTmsC2PJVZoUYVCcpPAL2fViXzuRO H9FSMexfRK8U5aKZS1k3PTUD2jNEx4FxC+ogFT7NbPWRUBAOSxTZTbY6PH6vaxJXtE VQcJyxihv9GgA== Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:36:08 +0100 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Zhi Wang Cc: "airlied@gmail.com" , "simona@ffwll.ch" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com" , "mripard@kernel.org" , "tzimmermann@suse.de" , "ajanulgu@redhat.com" , "lyude@redhat.com" , "pstanner@redhat.com" , Neo Jia , John Hubbard , Ben Skeggs , Andy Currid , "ojeda@kernel.org" , "alex.gaynor@gmail.com" , "boqun.feng@gmail.com" , "gary@garyguo.net" , "bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com" , "benno.lossin@proton.me" , "a.hindborg@kernel.org" , "aliceryhl@google.com" , "tmgross@umich.edu" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpu: nova-core: add initial documentation Message-ID: References: <20250204190400.2550-1-dakr@kernel.org> <20250204190400.2550-2-dakr@kernel.org> <20250205155646.00003c2f@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 07:44:19PM +0000, Zhi Wang wrote: > On 05/02/2025 18.10, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 03:56:46PM +0200, Zhi Wang wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:03:12 +0100 > >> Danilo Krummrich wrote: > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/nova/guidelines.rst b/Documentation/gpu/nova/guidelines.rst > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 000000000000..28a959f51c2c > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/nova/guidelines.rst > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > >>> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > >>> + > >> > >> I think this will develop into a maintainer handbook in the future which > >> reflects maintainer's requirements, thoughts, tips...maybe we can make it > >> explicit? I think it is rules of book that we agree to follow. > >> > >> A similar one can be found here. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230411171651.1067966-1-seanjc@google.com/ > > > > Yes, that's the idea. Is there anything additional you'd like to see added for > > this initial commit? > > > > I am mostly thinking of testing of vGPU, we can conclude that more > clearly when we have basic stuff working. IMO, maybe some brief > introduction about maintainer branches, requirements of patch comments, > e.g. prefix of patch titles to different components, expectation of the > patch comment body beside those already in submitting_patches.rst. I > think those would be helpful. I agree, but I don't think we need those things right from the get-go. Let's add those things subsequently.