* [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf()
@ 2025-07-24 19:59 Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-02 21:24 ` Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-09 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Seyediman Seyedarab @ 2025-07-24 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lyude, dakr, airlied, simona
Cc: dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel, Seyediman Seyedarab
snprintf() returns the number of characters that *would* have been
written, which can overestimate how much you actually wrote to the
buffer in case of truncation. That leads to 'data += this' advancing
the pointer past the end of the buffer and size going negative.
Switching to scnprintf() prevents potential buffer overflows and ensures
consistent behavior when building the output string.
Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
index b9581feb24cc..a23b40b27b81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ nvkm_snprintbf(char *data, int size, const struct nvkm_bitfield *bf, u32 value)
bool space = false;
while (size >= 1 && bf->name) {
if (value & bf->mask) {
- int this = snprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
+ int this = scnprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
space ? " " : "", bf->name);
size -= this;
data += this;
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf()
2025-07-24 19:59 [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf() Seyediman Seyedarab
@ 2025-08-02 21:24 ` Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-09 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Seyediman Seyedarab @ 2025-08-02 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lyude, dakr, airlied, simona; +Cc: dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel
On 25/07/24 03:59PM, Seyediman Seyedarab wrote:
> snprintf() returns the number of characters that *would* have been
> written, which can overestimate how much you actually wrote to the
> buffer in case of truncation. That leads to 'data += this' advancing
> the pointer past the end of the buffer and size going negative.
>
> Switching to scnprintf() prevents potential buffer overflows and ensures
> consistent behavior when building the output string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
> index b9581feb24cc..a23b40b27b81 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/enum.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ nvkm_snprintbf(char *data, int size, const struct nvkm_bitfield *bf, u32 value)
> bool space = false;
> while (size >= 1 && bf->name) {
> if (value & bf->mask) {
> - int this = snprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
> + int this = scnprintf(data, size, "%s%s",
> space ? " " : "", bf->name);
> size -= this;
> data += this;
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Hi there,
Just following up on this patch. Please let me know if there's any
feedback or if further changes are needed.
Regards,
Seyediman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf()
2025-07-24 19:59 [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf() Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-02 21:24 ` Seyediman Seyedarab
@ 2025-08-09 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2025-08-09 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seyediman Seyedarab
Cc: lyude, airlied, simona, dri-devel, nouveau, linux-kernel
On 7/24/25 9:59 PM, Seyediman Seyedarab wrote:
> snprintf() returns the number of characters that *would* have been
> written, which can overestimate how much you actually wrote to the
> buffer in case of truncation. That leads to 'data += this' advancing
> the pointer past the end of the buffer and size going negative.
>
> Switching to scnprintf() prevents potential buffer overflows and ensures
> consistent behavior when building the output string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <ImanDevel@gmail.com>
Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-09 12:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-24 19:59 [PATCH] drm/nouveau: replace snprintf() with scnprintf() in nvkm_snprintbf() Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-02 21:24 ` Seyediman Seyedarab
2025-08-09 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).