From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/pt: unify xe_pt_svm_pre_commit with userptr
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:18:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aArG12Znc5ToWA13@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424121827.862729-16-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:18:35PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> We now use the same notifier lock for SVM and userptr, with that we can
> combine xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit and xe_pt_svm_pre_commit.
>
> v2: (Matt B)
> - Re-use xe_svm_notifier_lock/unlock for userptr.
> - Combine svm/userptr handling further down into op_check_svm_userptr.
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
The Kconfig issues pointed out in the previous patch need to be fixed
but implementation here look correct:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 90 ++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h | 19 +++----
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> index ff898e518afd..a7db65f9913e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> @@ -1393,8 +1393,8 @@ static int vma_check_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int op_check_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> - struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update)
> +static int op_check_svm_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> + struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update)
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> @@ -1419,6 +1419,24 @@ static int op_check_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> err = vma_check_userptr(vm, gpuva_to_vma(op->base.prefetch.va),
> pt_update);
> break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
> + case DRM_GPUVA_OP_DRIVER:
> + if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE) {
> + struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
> +
> + xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT");
> +
> + xe_assert(vm->xe,
> + xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(op->map_range.vma));
> + xe_assert(vm->xe, op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE);
> +
> + if (!xe_svm_range_pages_valid(range)) {
> + xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT - RETRY");
> + err = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> +#endif
> default:
> drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "NOT POSSIBLE");
> }
> @@ -1426,7 +1444,7 @@ static int op_check_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> +static int xe_pt_svm_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> {
> struct xe_vm *vm = pt_update->vops->vm;
> struct xe_vma_ops *vops = pt_update->vops;
> @@ -1439,12 +1457,12 @@ static int xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - down_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
> + xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm);
>
> list_for_each_entry(op, &vops->list, link) {
> - err = op_check_userptr(vm, op, pt_update_ops);
> + err = op_check_svm_userptr(vm, op, pt_update_ops);
> if (err) {
> - up_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
> + xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -1452,42 +1470,6 @@ static int xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> return err;
> }
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
> -static int xe_pt_svm_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> -{
> - struct xe_vm *vm = pt_update->vops->vm;
> - struct xe_vma_ops *vops = pt_update->vops;
> - struct xe_vma_op *op;
> - int err;
> -
> - err = xe_pt_pre_commit(pt_update);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> -
> - xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(op, &vops->list, link) {
> - struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
> -
> - if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE)
> - continue;
> -
> - xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT");
> -
> - xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(op->map_range.vma));
> - xe_assert(vm->xe, op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE);
> -
> - if (!xe_svm_range_pages_valid(range)) {
> - xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT - RETRY");
> - xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
> - return -EAGAIN;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> struct invalidation_fence {
> struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence base;
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> @@ -1858,7 +1840,7 @@ static int bind_op_prepare(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_tile *tile,
> xe_vma_start(vma),
> xe_vma_end(vma));
> ++pt_update_ops->current_op;
> - pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock |= xe_vma_is_userptr(vma);
> + pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock |= xe_vma_is_userptr(vma);
>
> /*
> * If rebind, we have to invalidate TLB on !LR vms to invalidate
> @@ -1966,7 +1948,7 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile *tile,
> xe_pt_update_ops_rfence_interval(pt_update_ops, xe_vma_start(vma),
> xe_vma_end(vma));
> ++pt_update_ops->current_op;
> - pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock |= xe_vma_is_userptr(vma);
> + pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock |= xe_vma_is_userptr(vma);
> pt_update_ops->needs_invalidation = true;
>
> xe_pt_commit_prepare_unbind(vma, pt_op->entries, pt_op->num_entries);
> @@ -2289,22 +2271,12 @@ static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops migrate_ops = {
> .pre_commit = xe_pt_pre_commit,
> };
>
> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops userptr_migrate_ops = {
> +static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_userptr_migrate_ops = {
> .populate = xe_vm_populate_pgtable,
> .clear = xe_migrate_clear_pgtable_callback,
> - .pre_commit = xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit,
> + .pre_commit = xe_pt_svm_userptr_pre_commit,
> };
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_migrate_ops = {
> - .populate = xe_vm_populate_pgtable,
> - .clear = xe_migrate_clear_pgtable_callback,
> - .pre_commit = xe_pt_svm_pre_commit,
> -};
> -#else
> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_migrate_ops;
> -#endif
> -
> /**
> * xe_pt_update_ops_run() - Run PT update operations
> * @tile: Tile of PT update operations
> @@ -2331,9 +2303,7 @@ xe_pt_update_ops_run(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
> int err = 0, i;
> struct xe_migrate_pt_update update = {
> .ops = pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock ?
> - &svm_migrate_ops :
> - pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock ?
> - &userptr_migrate_ops :
> + &svm_userptr_migrate_ops :
> &migrate_ops,
> .vops = vops,
> .tile_id = tile->id,
> @@ -2455,8 +2425,6 @@ xe_pt_update_ops_run(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
>
> if (pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock)
> xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
> - if (pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock)
> - up_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
>
> return fence;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> index 69eab6f37cfe..dc0b2d8c3af8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h
> @@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops {
> u32 current_op;
> /** @needs_svm_lock: Needs SVM lock */
> bool needs_svm_lock;
> - /** @needs_userptr_lock: Needs userptr lock */
> - bool needs_userptr_lock;
> /** @needs_invalidation: Needs invalidation */
> bool needs_invalidation;
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> index 923cb074d0cb..696496b52465 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> @@ -87,15 +87,6 @@ static inline bool xe_svm_range_has_dma_mapping(struct xe_svm_range *range)
> return range->base.pages.flags.has_dma_mapping;
> }
>
> -#define xe_svm_assert_in_notifier(vm__) \
> - lockdep_assert_held_write(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock)
> -
> -#define xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm__) \
> - drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm)
> -
> -#define xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm__) \
> - drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm)
> -
> #else
> #include <linux/interval_tree.h>
>
> @@ -187,4 +178,14 @@ static inline void xe_svm_notifier_unlock(struct xe_vm *vm)
> {
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#define xe_svm_assert_in_notifier(vm__) \
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock)
> +
> +#define xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm__) \
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm)
> +
> +#define xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm__) \
> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(&(vm__)->svm.gpusvm)
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.49.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 12:18 [PATCH v3 0/7] Replace xe_hmm with gpusvm Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/gpusvm: fix hmm_pfn_to_map_order() usage Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/gpusvm: use more selective dma dir in get_pages() Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/gpusvm: pull out drm_gpusvm_pages substructure Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/gpusvm: refactor core API to use pages struct Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 21:47 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/gpusvm: export drm_gpusvm_pages API Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 22:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-24 22:04 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/userptr: replace xe_hmm with gpusvm Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 14:21 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-24 14:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-24 23:17 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-25 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-28 3:47 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2025-04-24 12:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/pt: unify xe_pt_svm_pre_commit with userptr Matthew Auld
2025-04-24 15:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-24 23:18 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aArG12Znc5ToWA13@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox