dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
Cc: <rmoar@google.com>, <davidgow@google.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<brendan.higgins@linux.dev>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<elver@google.com>, <dvyukov@google.com>,
	<lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:54:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJtHhZqiLk-z99cv@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811221739.2694336-4-marievic@google.com>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:17:35PM +0000, Marie Zhussupova wrote:
> To enable more complex parameterized testing scenarios,
> the generate_params() function needs additional context
> beyond just the previously generated parameter. This patch
> modifies the generate_params() function signature to
> include an extra `struct kunit *test` argument, giving
> test users access to the parameterized test context when
> generating parameters.
> 
> The `struct kunit *test` argument was added as the first parameter
> to the function signature as it aligns with the convention
> of other KUnit functions that accept `struct kunit *test` first.
> This also mirrors the "this" or "self" reference found
> in object-oriented programming languages.
> 
> This patch also modifies xe_pci_live_device_gen_param()
> in xe_pci.c and nthreads_gen_params() in kcsan_test.c
> to reflect this signature change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 
> - generate_params signature changes in
>   xe_pci.c and kcsan_test.c were squashed
>   into a single patch to avoid in-between
>   breakages in the series.
> - The comments and the commit message were changed to
>   reflect the parameterized testing terminology. See
>   the patch series cover letter change log for the
>   definitions.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c | 2 +-
>  include/kunit/test.h              | 9 ++++++---
>  kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c         | 2 +-
>  lib/kunit/test.c                  | 5 +++--
>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> index 1d3e2e50c355..62c016e84227 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_fake_device_init);
>   * Return: pointer to the next &struct xe_device ready to be used as a parameter
>   *         or NULL if there are no more Xe devices on the system.
>   */
> -const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(const void *prev, char *desc)
> +const void *xe_pci_live_device_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
>  {
>  	const struct xe_device *xe = prev;
>  	struct device *dev = xe ? xe->drm.dev : NULL;

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index d2e1b986b161..b527189d2d1c 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ struct kunit_attributes {
>  struct kunit_case {
>  	void (*run_case)(struct kunit *test);
>  	const char *name;
> -	const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc);
> +	const void* (*generate_params)(struct kunit *test,
> +				       const void *prev, char *desc);
>  	struct kunit_attributes attr;
>  	int (*param_init)(struct kunit *test);
>  	void (*param_exit)(struct kunit *test);
> @@ -1691,7 +1692,8 @@ do {									       \
>   * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters.
>   */
>  #define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(name, array, get_desc)						\
> -	static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)			\
> +	static const void *name##_gen_params(struct kunit *test,				\
> +					     const void *prev, char *desc)			\
>  	{											\
>  		typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array);	\
>  		if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) {					\
> @@ -1712,7 +1714,8 @@ do {									       \
>   * Define function @name_gen_params which uses @array to generate parameters.
>   */
>  #define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(name, array, desc_member)					\
> -	static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)			\
> +	static const void *name##_gen_params(struct kunit *test,				\
> +					     const void *prev, char *desc)			\
>  	{											\
>  		typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array);	\
>  		if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) {					\
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> index c2871180edcc..fc76648525ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static void test_atomic_builtins_missing_barrier(struct kunit *test)
>   * The thread counts are chosen to cover potentially interesting boundaries and
>   * corner cases (2 to 5), and then stress the system with larger counts.
>   */
> -static const void *nthreads_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)
> +static const void *nthreads_gen_params(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc)
>  {
>  	long nthreads = (long)prev;
>  
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index 49a5e6c30c86..01b20702a5a2 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  			/* Get initial param. */
>  			param_desc[0] = '\0';
>  			/* TODO: Make generate_params try-catch */
> -			curr_param = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
> +			curr_param = test_case->generate_params(&test, NULL, param_desc);
>  			test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
>  			kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
>  				  "KTAP version 1\n");
> @@ -726,7 +726,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  
>  				/* Get next param. */
>  				param_desc[0] = '\0';
> -				curr_param = test_case->generate_params(curr_param, param_desc);
> +				curr_param = test_case->generate_params(&test, curr_param,
> +									param_desc);
>  			}
>  			/*
>  			 * TODO: Put into a try catch. Since we don't need suite->exit
> -- 
> 2.51.0.rc0.205.g4a044479a3-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-12 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 22:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] kunit: Refactor and extend KUnit's parameterized testing framework Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] kunit: Add parent kunit for parameterized test context Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] kunit: Introduce param_init/exit for parameterized test context management Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params() Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 13:54   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-08-12 22:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  7:43   ` Marco Elver
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kunit: Enable direct registration of parameter arrays to a KUnit test Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] kunit: Add example parameterized test with shared resource management using the Resource API Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:17   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] kunit: Add example parameterized test with direct dynamic parameter array setup Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow
2025-08-11 22:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Documentation: kunit: Document new parameterized test features Marie Zhussupova
2025-08-12 22:23   ` Rae Moar
2025-08-13  9:18   ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJtHhZqiLk-z99cv@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=marievic@google.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).