From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: nuke VM_MIXEDMAP on BO mappings
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afc8cb60-fa91-2d72-1e2f-24110dd0935c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLfQEJy0PisO6eAh@phenom.ffwll.local>
Am 02.06.21 um 20:38 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:30:13AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> We discussed if that is really the right approach for quite a while now, but
>> digging deeper into a bug report on arm turned out that this is actually
>> horrible broken right now.
>>
>> The reason for this is that vmf_insert_mixed_prot() always tries to grab
>> a reference to the underlaying page on architectures without
>> ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL and as far as I can see also enabled GUP.
>>
>> So nuke using VM_MIXEDMAP here and use VM_PFNMAP instead.
>>
>> Also set VM_SHARED, not 100% sure if that is needed with VM_PFNMAP, but better
>> save than sorry.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> Bugs: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1606#note_936174
> I thought we still have the same issue open for ttm_bo_vm_insert_huge()?
> Or at least a potentially pretty big bug, because our current huge entries
> don't stop gup (because there's no pmd_mkspecial right now in the kernel).
>
> So I think if you want to close this for good then we also need to
> (temporarily at least) disable the huge entry code?
That's already done (at least for ~vmwgfx) because we ran into problems
we couldn't explain.
Going to add something which explicitly disable it with a comment.
What's the conclusion on VM_SHARED? Should I enforce this, warn about it
or just ignore it because it doesn't matter for VM_PFNMAP?
Thanks,
Christian.
> -Daniel
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 29 +++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> index 9bd15cb39145..bf86ae849340 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>> @@ -359,12 +359,7 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>> * at arbitrary times while the data is mmap'ed.
>> * See vmf_insert_mixed_prot() for a discussion.
>> */
>> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MIXEDMAP)
>> - ret = vmf_insert_mixed_prot(vma, address,
>> - __pfn_to_pfn_t(pfn, PFN_DEV),
>> - prot);
>> - else
>> - ret = vmf_insert_pfn_prot(vma, address, pfn, prot);
>> + ret = vmf_insert_pfn_prot(vma, address, pfn, prot);
>>
>> /* Never error on prefaulted PTEs */
>> if (unlikely((ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
>> @@ -411,15 +406,9 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_dummy_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pgprot_t prot)
>> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>
>> /* Prefault the entire VMA range right away to avoid further faults */
>> - for (address = vma->vm_start; address < vma->vm_end; address += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> -
>> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MIXEDMAP)
>> - ret = vmf_insert_mixed_prot(vma, address,
>> - __pfn_to_pfn_t(pfn, PFN_DEV),
>> - prot);
>> - else
>> - ret = vmf_insert_pfn_prot(vma, address, pfn, prot);
>> - }
>> + for (address = vma->vm_start; address < vma->vm_end;
>> + address += PAGE_SIZE)
>> + ret = vmf_insert_pfn_prot(vma, address, pfn, prot);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -576,14 +565,10 @@ static void ttm_bo_mmap_vma_setup(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct vm_area_s
>>
>> vma->vm_private_data = bo;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * We'd like to use VM_PFNMAP on shared mappings, where
>> - * (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) != 0, for performance reasons,
>> - * but for some reason VM_PFNMAP + x86 PAT + write-combine is very
>> - * bad for performance. Until that has been sorted out, use
>> - * VM_MIXEDMAP on all mappings. See freedesktop.org bug #75719
>> + /* Enforce VM_SHARED here since no driver backend actually supports COW
>> + * on TTM buffer object mappings.
>> */
>> - vma->vm_flags |= VM_MIXEDMAP;
>> + vma->vm_flags |= VM_PFNMAP | VM_SHARED;
>> vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 8:30 [PATCH] drm/ttm: nuke VM_MIXEDMAP on BO mappings Christian König
2021-06-02 9:07 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-06-02 10:03 ` Christian König
2021-06-02 11:24 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-06-02 12:04 ` Christian König
2021-06-02 12:21 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-02 18:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-02 19:20 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-06-02 18:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-02 18:46 ` Christian König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afc8cb60-fa91-2d72-1e2f-24110dd0935c@gmail.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox