From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997A5C44501 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DAC10E317; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ay9RStfR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630AB10E317; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C609741404; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F28231F000E9; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:13:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784193194; bh=iTgmRt/mOhfeVVtmxm9TcACq90Tyo5vsbd/jxsIv5Z8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ay9RStfRqzjIAkK9qMkR2z+5qf0qqqVKp9e3TmHYXeStbB17RWYaMTy3uBEQg9KdB u6SzyAyck8jHQYnZRcDZF2nv4JSlVK4s+Z9AU6vm4Z8hdBsYN/pLtEuoZ1uePJ0ei+ CgwmpsarAdZLu5fqmEDEh1cyx1Hkj2MzKeUhBMvb3bdhVqCABV+8VgCEe6FDEOjjO5 qL6/bzX0PVJJW9W9nJfTJrTOKM+osmvCPL9h6+QY3ZBSJrc6TfQFtxhuA1XgcYUKNj nNSh+4LtoZwZxaqnJtf/7k1p7/OJu8+sERq6XAOZ6syFQj2Cdz8ihwQ2xEfBx+fsWk BBTOOeQ6E91Fw== Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:12:56 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Stanislav Kinsburskii , airlied@gmail.com, akhilesh@ee.iitb.ac.in, corbet@lwn.net, dakr@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, kees@kernel.org, leon@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, lizhi.hou@amd.com, lyude@redhat.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mamin506@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, mripard@kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, ogabbay@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, simona@ffwll.ch, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, surenb@google.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, vbabka@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/hmm: Clarify notifier retry state and scope HMM timeouts Message-ID: References: <178406760622.1106335.2379450382728057793.stgit@skinsburskii> <4300f09b-8f93-4605-b072-7c09a82cb16e@kernel.org> <20260715101432.99957d2d33203fafe4af2e1c@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 10:59:56AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 7/15/26 19:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:39:37 -0700 Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Please don't do this, this is completely impossible to track for review :) > >>> > >>> mm review is currently very difficult based on volumes, it'll become impossible > >>> to manage if people sound fragments of series. > >>> > >>> Please just resend the whole thing at this point. > >>> > >> > >> Well, I followed the guidance provided by Andrew, and I believe he > >> applied all of the changes, including these, to the `mm` tree. > >> > >> Do you still want me to send v9 under these circumstances? > > > > Sure, if that's what reviewers prefer. > > > > This is a bit unfriendly to people who have already reviewed the code. > > Which is one of the reasons why I respond to a new version with a > > single diff showing reviewers (and the author, and myself) what changed > > since the previous version. > > As much as I dislike fixup patches, I tolerate them in reply to the existing series. > > But having some random fixup series is just crazy, really. > > -- > Cheers, > > David Yes. Stanislav - also see Jason's suggestion - if you give a base commit then sashiko seems to work better. Maybe look at using b4 which does all of this for you automatically? Thanks, Lorenzo