dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: drop register readback in cayman_cp_int_cntl_setup
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:21:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3c3f8b0-00fd-11fb-5d06-cf34a578d4c1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477344724-3607-1-git-send-email-dev@lynxeye.de>

Am 24.10.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Lucas Stach:
> The read is taking a considerable amount of time (about 50us on this
> machine). The register does not ever hold anything other than the ring
> ID that is updated in this exact function, so there is no need for
> the read modify write cycle.
>
> This chops off a big chunk of the time spent in hardirq disabled
> context, as this function is called multiple times in the interrupt
> handler. With this change applied radeon won't show up in the list
> of the worst IRQ latency offenders anymore, where it was a regular
> before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>

Ups, and to make it even worse SRBM_GFX_CNTL is explicitly documented to 
be a write only register.

That it takes a considerable amount of time is probably because the SRBM 
runs into an error condition when you read it.

So patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> and 
please also add a CC:stable on that.

Do we have other occasions where we try to use a read modify write cycle?

Regards,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c
> index 103fc86..a0d4a05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c
> @@ -1396,9 +1396,7 @@ static void cayman_pcie_gart_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>   void cayman_cp_int_cntl_setup(struct radeon_device *rdev,
>   			      int ring, u32 cp_int_cntl)
>   {
> -	u32 srbm_gfx_cntl = RREG32(SRBM_GFX_CNTL) & ~3;
> -
> -	WREG32(SRBM_GFX_CNTL, srbm_gfx_cntl | (ring & 3));
> +	WREG32(SRBM_GFX_CNTL, RINGID(ring));
>   	WREG32(CP_INT_CNTL, cp_int_cntl);
>   }
>   


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-24 21:32 [PATCH] drm/radeon: drop register readback in cayman_cp_int_cntl_setup Lucas Stach
2016-10-25  7:21 ` Christian König [this message]
2016-10-25 11:01   ` Lucas Stach
2016-10-25 15:26     ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3c3f8b0-00fd-11fb-5d06-cf34a578d4c1@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dev@lynxeye.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox