From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 101691] gfx corruption on windowed 3d-apps running on dGPU
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 01:47:52 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0727656133=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907936E7C9
for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 01:47:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0727656133==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15082912735.24E94.15494";
charset="UTF-8"
--15082912735.24E94.15494
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 01:47:53 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101691
--- Comment #54 from Alex Deucher ---
Please see comment 37. We support both snooped and unsnooped access to sys=
tem
memory. When we use unsnooped, we always use uncached memory. Does i915
always assume dma_bufs are cached?
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--15082912735.24E94.15494
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 01:47:53 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Please see comment 37=
. We support both snooped and unsnooped access to system
memory. When we use unsnooped, we always use uncached memory. Does i915
always assume dma_bufs are cached?