From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 108591] [CI][DRMTIP] igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@normal - fail -
Failed assertion: linear[i] == start_val
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 15:42:07 +0000
Message-ID:
What
Removed
Added
Status
RESOLVED
CLOSED
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #10)
> commit 7fa28e146994da1e8a4124623d7da97b798ea520 =
(HEAD ->
> drm-intel-next-queued, drm-intel/for-linux-next,
> drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued)
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Mon Nov 19 15:41:53 2018 +0000
>=20
> drm/i915: Write GPU relocs harder with gen3
>=20=20=20=20=20
> Under moderate amounts of GPU stress, we can observe on Bearlake a=
nd
> Pineview (later gen3 models) that we execute the following batch b=
uffer
> before the write into the batch is coherent. Adding extra (tested =
with
> upto 32x) MI_FLUSH to either the invalidation, flush or both phase=
s does
> not solve the incoherency issue with the relocations, but emitting=
the
> MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM twice does. So be it.
>=20=20=20=20=20
> Fixes: 7dd4f6729f92 ("drm/i915: Async GPU relocation processi=
ng")
> Testcase: igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits # blb/pnv
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181119154153.153=
27-1-
> chris@chris-wilson=
.co.uk
Oddly-enough, this was not sufficient to fix the issue, but it stopped fail=
ing
after drmtip_176
(https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/=
tree/drm-tip/drmtip_176/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_tiled_fence_blits@normal=
.html),
so closing!