Comme=
nt # 46
on bug 10934=
5
from Christian Zigotzky
(In reply to Michel D=C3=A4nzer from comment #45)
> Reviewing the information, I'm afraid it's not c=
lear that there's a bug here.
>=20
> The description says the FirePro is the secondary card in a PCIe 1x sl=
ot,
> whereas the R7 is in the PCIe 16x slot. Thus it seems pretty clear that
> without explicit configuration, Xorg should be expected to come up on =
the
> R7. Arguably it was actually the previous behaviour that was buggy.
>=20
> Something like this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf should be enough to make Xor=
g use
> the FirePro card:
>=20
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "whatever"
> BusID "PCI:5@4096:0:0"
> EndSection
Hi Michel,
Why did you close this bug report? Allan hasn't tested your solution yet.
My first question in this thread was, if you modified the behaviour of the
initialisation of two graphics cards in the DRM updates 'drm-next-2018-12-1=
4'.
The answer was: "No, the only changes were changes in comments, removi=
ng some
unused code and changes in the shared ttm module that touched all drivers t=
hat
use ttm."
This wasn't correct. I had to compile a lot of kernels and after that we kn=
owed
that you modified the behaviour of the initialisation of two graphics cards=
in
the DRM updates 'drm-next-2018-12-14'. And now you just closed this bug rep=
ort.
Please give Allan the chance to test your solution.
PLEASE check your code more carefully before you release it. There are a lo=
t of
endusers who uses this code in they daily work later.
Cheers,
Christian