Comme=
nt # 24
on bug 10934=
5
from Christian Zigotzky
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #23)
> (In reply to Christian Zigotzky from comment #22)
> > Again. Did you modify the behaviour of the initialisation of two =
graphics
> > cards in the DRM updates 'drm-next-2018-12-14'? If you say no, th=
en I can
> > look in the PowerPC updates. You need to know if there was a chan=
ge or you
> > don't know what you published. It's not the task for the enduser =
to look in
> > your code or bisect the code because you don't know the changes. =
It is
> > always the same. You changed the code and after that we have issu=
es and we
> > endusers and first level support have to figure out where the pro=
blem is.
> > And if we don't figure out the issue then the issue remains. It's=
easy to
> > write that you don't have this platform.
>=20
> No, the only changes were changes in comments, removing some unused co=
de and
> changes in the shared ttm module that touched all drivers that use ttm=
.
Thank you for your reply! OK, we know that without the DRM updates 2018-12-=
14
the 2 graphics cards work together without any problems. With which good and
bad commit should I start bisecting?
@Allan
I have to compile a lot of test kernels but I can=E2=80=99t test them becau=
se I don=E2=80=99t
have these two graphics cards. Please test all test kernels.