Comment # 49 on bug 110781 from Richard Thier

> as if the Xpress 200M wasn't slow enough, the screen has
> a resolution of > 1680x1050 when the typical resolution,
> at the time, was 1280x800.

I don't get it. Is there no supported resolution below that big one? That is
quite hard to believe. Mine is 1024x768 when maxed, but sometimes I reverse
engineer game binaries that do not let me use 640x480 in case they lag haha.

Fill rate really drops a lot when the resolution is high because of the
mentioned square-relation of the screen area to pixel count...