From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 110781] Radeon: heavy r300 performance drop regression between 11.x and 19.x Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 08:38:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2087448856==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96C289C9A for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:38:37 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============2087448856== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15598967170.eA270.22076" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --15598967170.eA270.22076 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:38:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110781 --- Comment #49 from Richard Thier --- > as if the Xpress 200M wasn't slow enough, the screen has > a resolution of > 1680x1050 when the typical resolution, > at the time, was 1280x800. I don't get it. Is there no supported resolution below that big one? That is quite hard to believe. Mine is 1024x768 when maxed, but sometimes I reverse engineer game binaries that do not let me use 640x480 in case they lag haha. Fill rate really drops a lot when the resolution is high because of the mentioned square-relation of the screen area to pixel count... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15598967170.eA270.22076 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:38:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comme= nt # 49 on bug 11078= 1 from = Richard Thier 
> as if the Xpress 200M wasn't slow e=
nough, the screen has
> a resolution of > 1680x1050 when the typical resolution,
> at the time, was 1280x800.

I don't get it. Is there no supported resolution below that big one? That is
quite hard to believe. Mine is 1024x768 when maxed, but sometimes I reverse
engineer game binaries that do not let me use 640x480 in case they lag haha.

Fill rate really drops a lot when the resolution is high because of the
mentioned square-relation of the screen area to pixel count...

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15598967170.eA270.22076-- --===============2087448856== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs --===============2087448856==--