From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 110781] Radeon: heavy r300 performance drop regression between 11.x and 19.x Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 06:53:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0956359907==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8A08955D for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:53:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0956359907== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15596312081.0EEa7449.5430" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --15596312081.0EEa7449.5430 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:53:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110781 --- Comment #24 from Richard Thier --- Sorry! I have to add that the above printf only prints as such if I use my hacky patch on latest git! I will try what it says with the "proposed fix" patch of Marek as the body of radeon_get_heap_index seems to need RADEON_FLAG_NO_INTERPROCESS_SHARING so the above might be misleading withou= t me telling what are the exact circumstances. But the assert I was running into even with the proposed fix - just I wante= d to try if there is a difference between the hacky fix and the normal one in the assert appearing or not... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15596312081.0EEa7449.5430 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:53:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comme= nt # 24 on bug 11078= 1 from = Richard Thier 
Sorry! I have to add that the above printf only prints as such=
 if I use my
hacky patch on latest git! I will try what it says with the "proposed =
fix"
patch of Marek as the body of radeon_get_heap_index seems to need
RADEON_FLAG_NO_INTERPROCESS_SHARING so the above might be misleading withou=
t me
telling what are the exact circumstances.

But the assert I was running into even with the proposed fix - just I wante=
d to
try if there is a difference between the hacky fix and the normal one in the
assert appearing or not...

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15596312081.0EEa7449.5430-- --===============0956359907== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs --===============0956359907==--