Comme=
nt # 63
on bug 11089=
7
from cosiekvfj@o2.pl
(In reply to Richard Thier from comment #58)
> Also there was one time where things were workin=
g for me before changes but
> I do not know what the pipe value was back then. So yes, there is SOME
> chance that this register can also return 1 in my case too, but it see=
ms
> most of the time (99% at least if not 100%) it returns 3.
It would be lovely if you could replicate that=E2=80=A6
Also this is consistent with your mesa testing earlier. That sometimes when=
you
compiled mesa with your patches and stock mesa they were both working/not
working. But that means that this weird behaviour:
17.1.2-1 crash(different)
17.1.1-1 crash(different)
17.1.0-1 crash(different)
17.0.5-1 working
17.0.4-2 working
17.0.4-1 crash
17.0.3-2 working
17.0.3-1 crash
17.0.2-2 working
17.0.2-1 crash
17.0.1-2 crash
17.0.1-1 crash
17.0.0-3 crash
17.0.0-2 crash
17.0.0-1 crash
13.0.4-2 crash
is something different than this bug. But I don't believe that there were a=
ny
changes between for example 17.0.3-1 and 17.0.3-2=E2=80=A6
Sooo, reboot, cold start, suspend don't change anything with pipe numbers?
Also if you take a look at my old piglit tests, there were definitely more =
bugs
with HyperZ on.
Also great work so far!