Commen=
t # 5
on bug 11124=
4
from Michel D=C3=A4nzer
(In reply to cspack from comment #4)
> The first bisect pointed to a merge commit so th=
e second was done to bisect
> within the merged commits.
That doesn't invalidate my previous comment. :) git bisect identifying a me=
rge
commit already indicates the same thing by itself. In particular, the fact =
that
it identified a merge commit means that you declared all of its parent comm=
its
good.
(There *are* rare cases where a problem is actually introduced by a merge
commit itself, but then the second bisection should have either identified =
the
same merge commit again (if you tested it again), or failed, because all the
other commits you tested should have been good again.)