From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 172421] radeon: allow to set the TMDS frequency by a special kernel parameter
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 02:53:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-172421-2300-u8Q3gsEb23@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-172421-2300@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172421
Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger@gmx.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rscheidegger@gmx.ch
--- Comment #13 from Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger@gmx.ch> ---
(In reply to Elmar Stellnberger from comment #9)
> any other opinion by someone else on this issue?
FWIW enthusiasts love such things, but corporations do not. Hence you don't see
overclocking and similar unspecified stuff in drivers not maintained by
community generally.
Personally I've always thought the risk of damaging hardware with any kind of
overclocking is just about exactly zero as long as you don't increase voltage
levels (and you can handle the additional heat but that should be a non-issue
here). That's my limited understanding of the physics behind it :-).
I suspect part of the reason why it overclocks so well is also that this chip
should be DP 1.2 capable - meaning HBR2 mode which has a clock of 270Mhz (not
that you can really get cards with that chip which actually do have the DP
port...). Now the signalling is different with DP vs. HDMI/DVI but if I had to
take a guess I'd suspect the hw is mostly all the same.
But none of that is going to change the opinion of overclocking of anyone...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 18:15 [Bug 172421] New: radeon: allow to set the TMDS frequency by a special kernel parameter bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:16 ` [Bug 172421] " bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 18:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 19:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 20:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-21 20:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-22 7:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-22 7:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-22 13:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-23 2:53 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2016-09-23 7:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-23 16:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-23 17:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-09-24 18:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-12-16 18:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-11-27 3:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-11-27 12:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-02-23 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-19 15:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-19 15:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-01-03 12:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-04-04 8:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-172421-2300-u8Q3gsEb23@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).