From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 45018] [bisected] rendering regression since added support for
	virtual address space on cayman v11
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:18:28 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-45018-502-cravzT4Vwk@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
References: <bug-45018-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from annarchy.freedesktop.org (annarchy.freedesktop.org
	[131.252.210.176])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32979E95A
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 11:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45018-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018

--- Comment #56 from Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com> 2012-05-30 11:18:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> (In reply to comment #54)
> > On latest git (3cd7bee48f7caf7850ea64d40f43875d4c975507), in
> > src/gallium/drivers/r600/r66_hw_context.c, on line 194, shouldn't it be:
> > - int offset
> > + unsigned offset
> 
> That might be slightly better, but it doesn't really matter. It's the offset
> from the start of the MMIO aperture, so it would only matter if the register
> aperture grew beyond 2GB, which we're almost 5 orders of magnitude short of.
> Very unlikely.
> 
> 
> > Also, at line 1259, I'm not quite sure why it is shifted by 2. Most of the
> > time, offset is usually shifted by 8.
> 
> It's just converting offset from units of 32 bits to bytes.
> 
> 
> > Just looking through the code to see if something could have been missed...
> 
> Right now it would be most useful to track down why radeon_bomgr_find_va /
> radeon_bomgr_force_va ends up returning the offset the kernel complains about.

What do you suggest? I'll be playing with kernel 3.5-rc1 when available, but I
don't think that will fix it. Is there or could there be a way to track what's
going on with a debug switch or something similar?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.