From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 59982] Radeon: evergreen Atombios in loop during initialization on ppc64
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59982-502-WLLyBTLfTK@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-59982-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2076 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59982
--- Comment #13 from Lucas Kannebley Tavares <lucaskt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> ---
Thanks for clarifying those things!
Well, I ran into a brand new set of questions while pursuing this.
> 0006: 370000 SET_ATI_PORT 0000 (INDIRECT_IO_MM)
> Select the mmio register aperture.
This sounds like selecting BARs, but from what I see, Region 0 would be the
framebuffer (256M) and Region 2 would be the MMIO registers. Or how are those
addresses mapped from within the adapter? Or does that mean that there are
multiple register banks and you're picking one?
> 0009: 5214 CALL_TABLE 14
>(ASIC_StaticPwrMgtStatusChange/SetUniphyInstance)
>SetUniphyInstance updates the offset for the selected crtc based on args.ucCRTC >parameter.
How are parameters passed here? Does it get the same parameters that the first
call received? I take it, the reference for param[00] there means ucCRTC, then.
Is that it?
> 0010: 3d650001 COMP param[00] [..X.] <- 01
> This checks the params to see is we are enabling the lock (args.ucEnable =
> ATOM_ENABLE) or disabling the lock (args.ucEnable = ATOM_DISABLE)
Ok, so, why is now param[00] referencing ucEnable? What is the reference to
ucCRTC here?
> 0034: 492f00 JUMP_NotEqual 002f
> If the bit is high, we jump back to 0x002f. If the bit is low, we're done.
So, the bit being low here means we don't have an update pending. Does it being
high mean that the lock is still in effect (i.e. the CLEAR commands didn't take
the disables down?)?
> 0044: 3a0000 SET_REG_BLOCK 0000
> 0047: 5b EOT
This seems to me like stack cleanup and return (I'm guessing EOT is End Of
Table). Is that correct?
On the kernel driver side, I couldn't find who is calling, or what's the
purpose of the crtc_prepare and crtc_commit functions, which are the only ones
apparently using this call (atombios_lock_crtc). What are they meant to do?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3082 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 18:37 [Bug 59982] New: Radeon: evergreen Atombios in loop during initialization on ppc64 bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-28 18:38 ` [Bug 59982] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 3:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 3:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 12:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 12:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-30 19:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 10:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 15:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-06 17:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-06 17:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-08 17:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-08 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-09 14:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-13 13:38 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2013-02-13 14:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-18 16:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-18 16:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 14:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 15:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 15:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 16:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 18:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-20 22:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-22 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-22 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 14:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 15:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 15:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 16:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 17:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-27 17:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-02-28 17:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-59982-502-WLLyBTLfTK@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox