From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:13:46 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0393074641=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F72E68A4
for ;
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:13:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0393074641==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1359476025.0B5BbA60.706"; charset="us-ascii"
--1359476025.0B5BbA60.706
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:13:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #6 from Dave Witbrodt ---
I do not know how to interpret these findings. I am not a developer, and work
with the few tools that I (sort of) know how to use much more slowly than
experienced developers would. I ran out of time over the weekend, and will
have
to investigate further this coming weekend.
I have been trying to think of possible explanations:
- could a later commit causes a similar (or identical)
memory leak to the one caused by 4ac0533a?
- is the problem really located somewhere else
besides in the kernel DRM, such as in Mesa, with
it being triggered by more than one kind of
code change in the DRM?
I thought that the bisection would be conclusive, but the failure of the revert
attempts undermined my goal. If no one demands that I bisect using one of the
drm-airlied branches, then I will try another custom branch which drops the
commit first causing the leak, and see if any later commits also cause a leak.
(If a developer demands that I bisect an upstream branch, I'll do that
instead.)
Is there anything else I can do to be helpful at this point?
Can any of you confirm/reproduce this memory leak on your own systems?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--1359476025.0B5BbA60.706
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:13:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Comment # 6
on bug 60028
from Dave Witbrodt
I do not know how to interpret these findings. I am not a developer, and work
with the few tools that I (sort of) know how to use much more slowly than
experienced developers would. I ran out of time over the weekend, and will
have
to investigate further this coming weekend.
I have been trying to think of possible explanations:
- could a later commit causes a similar (or identical)
memory leak to the one caused by 4ac0533a?
- is the problem really located somewhere else
besides in the kernel DRM, such as in Mesa, with
it being triggered by more than one kind of
code change in the DRM?
I thought that the bisection would be conclusive, but the failure of the revert
attempts undermined my goal. If no one demands that I bisect using one of the
drm-airlied branches, then I will try another custom branch which drops the
commit first causing the leak, and see if any later commits also cause a leak.
(If a developer demands that I bisect an upstream branch, I'll do that
instead.)
Is there anything else I can do to be helpful at this point?
Can any of you confirm/reproduce this memory leak on your own systems?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
--1359476025.0B5BbA60.706--
--===============0393074641==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--===============0393074641==--